JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agoInteresting how artists don't make enough money from their creations, so our solution is to make certain information illegal to share, rather than give them a universal basic income.message-square85fedilinkarrow-up1409arrow-down183
arrow-up1326arrow-down1message-squareInteresting how artists don't make enough money from their creations, so our solution is to make certain information illegal to share, rather than give them a universal basic income.JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square85fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoyour Samsung example is trademark. it’s not copyright.
minus-squareshrugal@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoBecause the example is not about copyright in particular but monopoly vs exclusive access. I wanted one that’s not about art to illustrate the point, and the priciple is the same in this regard.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agotrademark has nothing to do with copyright. they’re two sets of laws that developed a two different times for two different reasons.
your Samsung example is trademark. it’s not copyright.
Because the example is not about copyright in particular but monopoly vs exclusive access. I wanted one that’s not about art to illustrate the point, and the priciple is the same in this regard.
trademark has nothing to do with copyright. they’re two sets of laws that developed a two different times for two different reasons.