It still works at scale. If I’m selling a couch on craigslist for $10, I’d have to be a massive butthole to advertise it at $9.99. The fuck am I going to do, give them a penny in change? $10 is $10. I only need to sell it once, and I do not have the patience to deal with someone looking to haggle.
That’s not a persuasive argument. I’m not interested in haggling. The price is $10. If you see that and think “Oh, I’ll offer $5” then the answer is “no”. We’re sure as shit not going to meet in the middle at $7.50.
Same argument at $400. That’s what I want to get for it, which is why I put that price on it. I don’t want $399 or $250, because life is too short and I’m not that desperate to sell anything. I’d rather give it away for free than haggle with someone over the price. I don’t need to sell it today, and I’m happy to wait for someone who is willing to pay the asking price. I’m not running a pawn shop.
Right, and my point is that we don’t question it because it would be absurd to sell one-off items on-digit-removed from the actual selling price. I wouldn’t buy anything from someone selling shit on craigslist for $99 because it’s the sort of dishonest advertising that takes advantage of a psychological bias. I understand why Walmart does it, but that doesn’t make it a smart thing that good people do. It’s ths sort of deceptive thing greedy people do.
Then I want $400. Like I said, I onlyhave to sell it once. I don’t need to sell it to more than one person.
And if I saw someone selling a refrigerator for $399, personally it would make me doubt their trustworthiness.
The left digit bias is real over large groups of people. You’re going to sell more laptops at $399 because of left digit bias, but it doesn’t make a discernable difference when you’re only selling one. And again, then I have to deal with making change. Somebody’s going to hand me four hundred dollar bills, and I’m going to dig into my pocket for a crumpled single? Or maybe three quarters, two dimes, and a nickel?
It still works at scale. If I’m selling a couch on craigslist for $10, I’d have to be a massive butthole to advertise it at $9.99. The fuck am I going to do, give them a penny in change? $10 is $10. I only need to sell it once, and I do not have the patience to deal with someone looking to haggle.
deleted by creator
That’s not a persuasive argument. I’m not interested in haggling. The price is $10. If you see that and think “Oh, I’ll offer $5” then the answer is “no”. We’re sure as shit not going to meet in the middle at $7.50.
Same argument at $400. That’s what I want to get for it, which is why I put that price on it. I don’t want $399 or $250, because life is too short and I’m not that desperate to sell anything. I’d rather give it away for free than haggle with someone over the price. I don’t need to sell it today, and I’m happy to wait for someone who is willing to pay the asking price. I’m not running a pawn shop.
deleted by creator
Right, and my point is that we don’t question it because it would be absurd to sell one-off items on-digit-removed from the actual selling price. I wouldn’t buy anything from someone selling shit on craigslist for $99 because it’s the sort of dishonest advertising that takes advantage of a psychological bias. I understand why Walmart does it, but that doesn’t make it a smart thing that good people do. It’s ths sort of deceptive thing greedy people do.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Then I want $400. Like I said, I onlyhave to sell it once. I don’t need to sell it to more than one person.
And if I saw someone selling a refrigerator for $399, personally it would make me doubt their trustworthiness.
The left digit bias is real over large groups of people. You’re going to sell more laptops at $399 because of left digit bias, but it doesn’t make a discernable difference when you’re only selling one. And again, then I have to deal with making change. Somebody’s going to hand me four hundred dollar bills, and I’m going to dig into my pocket for a crumpled single? Or maybe three quarters, two dimes, and a nickel?