YouTube is changing the homepage experience for users who have their watch history turned off. They will now see an almost blank homepage with just a search bar and buttons for Shorts, Subscriptions and Library. This is intended to make it clear that personalized recommendations rely on watch history data. The new design aims to avoid extreme thumbnails and instead focus search. Some users have already started seeing this change, though it may not be fully rolled out yet. The goal is to both help those who prefer searching over recommendations, and potentially encourage users to turn their history back on. Overall this represents a major interface change focused on watch history preferences.


What’s been your experience with youtube recommendations? For me they are consistently hot garbage.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The change is all part of a “new viewer experience” Google announced on Tuesday.

    That means you’ll only see the search bar on the homepage, along with the Shorts, Subscriptions, and Library buttons.

    This could come as a welcome change for people who hate sifting through increasingly extreme thumbnails to find the play button, but it could also be a way to annoy users into turning the history back on.

    Google says it’s going to roll out this feature “over the next few months,” but several users across the web are already seeing the change.

    In place of YouTube’s recommended videos is a notice that reads, “Your watch history is off.

    “We are launching this new experience to make it more clear which YouTube features rely on watch history to provide video recommendations and make it more streamlined for those of you who prefer to search rather than browse recommendations,” Google writes.

  • thingsiplay@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    @trashhalo I have the watch history disabled for years now. And the results for the home feed recommendations was more or less of content from the subscriptions I had, with a sprinkle of other content when scrolling down. Wasn’t too bad, at least better than what can be seen when logged off. But overall I don’t care if the home feed recommendations get disabled for me. Not worth trading off the watch history to Google. It’s fine for me.

    There is still recommendation on the video itself, for related content. Also you can discover other channels by searching or with third party sites sites (where it gets shared). There is plenty of opportunities to discover new content. I personally rely and use mostly the Subscriptions feed view with my 137 subscriptions.

    Edit: https://myaccount.google.com/u/0/yourdata/youtube

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same

      I used to use an extension to do something similar, but disabled it when I went and cleared out a bunch

      The trend across different interfaces seems to be to crowd it with more junk. Cleaning it up seems like a win, as long as the content is still accessible through other means.

    • thingsiplay@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @peter I’m not actually sure if this is a privacy win at all. I use Google for years with disabled history (and other stuff disabled) and this new change does not make any difference to my privacy. At the moment, still, the home feed recommendations is mostly about videos from my subscriptions, past videos and the newest one. All it does is take away that view, which does not improve privacy. What actually improves privacy is to disable the history, which you could do since years.

      Edit: I totally forgot the link I wanted to provide: https://myaccount.google.com/u/0/yourdata/youtube

      • Big P@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        But if you disabled the history and they still had recommendations then they were still storing your history in some capacity. Now they’re probably not doing that.

      • WorstPyroEver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, it should look like the Google home page. I’m actually surprised google has never gone the way of Yahoo, MSN, etc and crammed their home page full of shit “news” articles & videos.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what makes them different and they know it, the simple search page. They learned a long time ago to fill the results page with shit instead

          • nickajeglin@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yesterday, for the first time, I got google search results that were entirely useless. I don’t remember what I searched, but it was a relatively simple question and I was kind of in a hurry. The only results I got were video thumbnails and sponsored products… Also presented as thumbnails. Barely any text anywhere to tell me what the thumbnails were supposed to be. They even removed the choices across the top so I couldn’t select “all”.

            It’s been getting worse for years, but that was the last straw for me. I don’t want to search the web on “large thumbnails”, I want “detail view”. Sometimes I’m searching for a product, but mostly I need information in the form of text written by a real human. If a search engine can’t give me that, then it’s not useful anymore.

            Really frustrating. I guess I better get around to using duckduckgo everywhere.

  • wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would be an excellent change if they replaced it with a chronological timeline, but we all know they won’t do that even though their backend already generates RSS feeds and it would barely take any effort to integrate with the frontend

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never open youtube to watch what’s on the homepage, so that’s a plus for me. I also don’t watch using an account so it doesn’t matter either way.

  • Rentlar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    For my use case this is a positive change (for once). The less data I need to waste loading a Mr. Beast face thumbnail I don’t need the better.

    I wonder if it is intended to cause NewPipe to crash, lol. Or to instead fill the page with ads later.

  • dap@lemmy.onlylans.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know how I feel about this personally. On the one hand, I feel like this is a privacy win for those who want it: no watch history means no algorithmic recommendations and (presumably) less data collection for those users. On the other hand, I personally really enjoy the recommendations that YouTube makes for me. Maybe it is the wide variety of content that I watch, but I’m honestly very pleased with the recommendations that YouTube provides. That being said, I feel like the opt-in to algorithmic recommendations is a good thing overall, however I am personally going to leave my watch history enabled.

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    From what i’ve been able to tell this is one of the few good changes they’ve done. You won’t get crap you don’t care about if you’re not logged in and haven’t watched anything.

  • tal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s been your experience with youtube recommendations?

    I’ve never had a YouTube account, so YouTube doesn’t have any persistent data on me as an individual to do recommendations unless it can infer who I am from other data.

    They seem to do a decent job of recommending the next video in a series done in a playlist by an author, which is really the only utility I get out of suggestions that YouTube gives me (outside of search results, which I suppose are themselves a form of recommendation). I’d think that YouTube could do better by just providing an easy way to get from the video to such a list, but…

    • WookieMunster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never had a YouTube account, so YouTube doesn’t have any persistent data on me as an individual

      Pretty sure they do anyway

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a marked improvement. I don’t want their stupid algorithm feeding me bullshit.

  • WagesOf@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nothing of value was lost. With my history on all it shows me is fucking right wing hate and shit I’ve already watched.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or just any hate shit. Right now my feed is full of hate for everything Star Wars because I’m a huge fan. I’m perfectly aware of all the flaws and could pen some epic rants myself, but I’d rather focus on what I enjoy.

      Though… I do feel like lately 90% of hate material seems to be from people with right wing leanings.

  • Poggervania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like how Google thinks it’s going to encourage people turning it on when it’s probably going to do the opposite.

    • Boinketh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure why people think that turning their history off protects their privacy. What’s to stop Google from just not showing you your history if you try to turn it off? I’m sure they still collect all of that data.

        • Boinketh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough. When my history was off, the recommendations were bad. I just made my bookmark link directly to the Subscriptions page.