The pharmaceutical lobby strongly opposed the Biden administration’s plan to directly negotiate drug prices for 10 medications with Medicare. PhRMA argued this will hurt innovation, but advocates note that drug companies make 76% more than needed for R&D. Eliquis, which costs Medicare over $16 billion, will be subject to negotiations. The policy was enabled by the Inflation Reduction Act, which PhRMA spent millions lobbying against. PhRMA sued over the negotiations, but the DOJ moved to dismiss the case. Advocates believe this defeat of Big Pharma will not be the last as negotiations may expand to over 100 drugs in the future, greatly helping seniors and people with disabilities access affordable medications.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Big Pharma: we need to charge extortion rates to pay for R&D

    Public: oh, cool, so you are using that money to pay the research, and not taking half of it in management bonus?

    Big Pharma: …

    Public: You are not pocketing half of it right, right?

    Big Pharma: COMMUNISTS!!! The CEO needs the 3rd yacht otherwise he’ll refuse to sign on the research, do you want that?

    • DrPop@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Biden is an expert at politicking. He hasn’t done anything to slow down the war machine. I understand providing supplies to Ukraine for foreign allies in Eastern Europe. But we do a lot of fuck shit at the small scale.

  • nob0dy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    A win is a win, so the Americans should take it were they can but this will just push costs elsewhere. I image they’ll just recoup the profit on the next 10 most popular drugs were they can gouge. We really need to start talking about comprehensive healthcare reform, a revolution so to speak, that stops this stupid patchwork and actually give us universal healthcare.

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just wondering, but why would Big Pharma need to sue over negotiations? Are they compromising or being told what the prices will be from now on?

  • taylus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    tHiS wIlL hUrT iNnOvAtIoN

    so tired of seeing this fucking response from parasite CEOs and their wannabe bootlickers

    • deo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe if they didn’t spend so much money on those horrible TV ads they’d have enough for R&D. And evergreening isn’t innovation anyways, so idk what they’re on about.

  • circularfish@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Amazed at how the same people who defend a business model that depends on price inelasticities to extract the last dime for lifesaving meds somehow react with horror at the idea that the biggest negotiator of pharmaceutical prices in the U.S. has the gall to negotiate lower prices. The government isn’t ‘dictating’ anything. It is using its market power to drive the price down.

    That is the vaunted free market at work. Anything else is just corporate socialism.

      • circularfish@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That was a dig directed at those that shout “socialism “ at things that are clearly not socialism (like negotiating prescription drug prices), but you are of course correct. Thank you for correcting my rhetorical excess, internet friend!

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cry me a river.

    Better yet, Big Pharma, bleed me a river, full of the money you’ve gouged from the sick and the dying, of insulin profits and unpaid wages. Bleed until you fucking die, you inhuman parasites.