• Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boomers assuming people become conservative as a function of time as opposed to a function of “getting theirs”. I have no evidence but it seems to be you’re less likely to become conservative without having amassed some wealth to conserve…

  • AliOski@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    100 years ago a big part of the young generation was socialist too. Look how much changed.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. We have to be weary that the owning class will put “leftists” in front of us to “vote for” and then this political energy will go to waste. Or they will draft us, or change the voting age, or get KOSA to pass. Idk. We gotta keep dodging the wrenches and throwing our hammers back at them.

    • masquenox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This whole obsession with policing people’s nationality came about because states were trying to clamp down on the massive amounts of working-class agitation that erupted across the world straight after WW1 - but all that history has essentially been scrubbed out from the “official” narratives.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You need to have a sense of ownership and responsibility for your community.”

    “So you’re actually going to let me invest in the community and own things?”

    “What? No! Jesus, no. I want you to feel responsible for my stuff and work to preserve a status quo that will never serve you.”

  • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if they were socialists, would I become a conservative just to spite them? I am honestly not 100% certain. I very well may be just that shallow.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Historically, people have become more conservative, not as they age, but as they become more financially secure, own their own home, and want to keep more of the fruits of their labour.

    That’s increasingly not happening, and we’re not happy about it.

    • db2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      and want to keep more of the fruits of their labour

      Most conservatives want to keep the fruits of other peoples labor.

      • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. If you went to school for 16 years to become a neurosurgeon, I have no problem with your $500k salary. But a $1mil+ salary because you started a fast food chain where the employees make minimum wage? That’s slavery.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Fruits of their labor”

      Well, fruits of exploitation of the global south that made your labor worth so much more than theirs.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a common mistake among conservatives that they believe everyone is as self-centered and greedy as they are

    I’ve not become more conservative as I age because I’d kill myself before becoming that awful to people around me

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not knocking your worthy efforts, but the vast majority of people don’t turn conservative because of ideological reasons, they do it because they want to keep what they acquired over their lives.

      The people don’t become conservative any more because everyone younger than 40 pretty has pretty much gotten the economic middle finger across the board, so people turn radical instead. If I have nothing to lose I don’t feel protective of the status quo.

      But the greedy fucks in charge around the world are so removed from the reality of life they cannot see past their bank account, and would rather concede to fascism to keep things going for a bit longer, than making the needed changes. For the lost generations and the planet itself.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being protective of your good fortune at the expense of others is itself part of an ideology, so I don’t see why you felt the need to contradict and condescend. A person who’s not a piece of shit would have no business being a conservative, no matter how privileged they are.

        Now go argue with someone else because I’m getting big reddit energy from you, and it’s making me anxious.

        • natebluehooves@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only big reddit energy was this comment and the subsequent doubling down. The comment above was an even handed rebuttal, this response is tone policing and name calling.

          You may disagree with his rebuttal but this is not how you respond to adversity.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wow, what a hot take. I’m so thankful you stepped in to defend the debatelord. What a great use of your time!

            Just a tip: If you have nothing constructive to add to a conversation, keep it to yourself. Have fun on my blocklist.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t understand why they even went so off the rails. I just gave an addition to their statement which I prefaced with positive affirmation, to make sure the following text isn’t misinterpreted as ridiculing them in their effort.

            Granted I l maybe shouldn’t have cursed as much, but I didn’t even insult anyone specifically, not even republicans as some other people suggest. Just the political leadership that is complicit in suppressing the needed change to save our ecosystem and remedy the ridiculous inequality mankind has to endure.

            Apparently that’s enough to make them block me and then continue to rant about me in random comments.

            Guess im done with this conversation, it turned weirdly toxic for no fault of mine.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Next time, either be considerate and don’t lead with a debatelord’s tone, or don’t comment at all if you can’t resist being an argumentative prick

            • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I understand that the last paragraph of their comment was unnecessary and inflammatory, but this (insults etc) is not the way to point that out…

            • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How about I express myself as I see fit, and you compose yourself for the next time someone writes in a way that makes you feel “anxious” yet at the same time unable to control the urge to lecture them.

              Who are you to tell me how I should express myself?

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                When you treat people like shit and throw pointed words at them, I’m going to call you out for it. I don’t owe you an apology.

                But fair enough, I’ll block you. I had my fill of you neckbeards during my miserable tenure on reddit, and I never want to speak to you again.

                • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Whom did I treat like shit in your opinion? I have not addressed anyone except nameless politicians.

                  Maybe spend less time arguing with people you say you don’t want to argue with and more on improving your reading comprehension

          • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I get their point - the “greedy [expletive]” part was insulting and unnecessary. But I do think they are overreacting quite a bit…

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            And I think you ought to keep your thoughts to yourself, if you have nothing worth contributing besides haughty arrogance and presumption.

            Besides, I did read their whole comment. That’s what I responded to.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s EXACTLY MY POINT. If someone agrees with you, then why lead with something as pretentious and haughty as “Not to knock your worthy efforst, but…”

                Why talk down to someone like that and adopt the tone of a pretentious debatelord when you ultimately agree with the other person?

                I encountered people like that all over reddit, so I recognize them – the type of people who think any conversation is a debate that you must “win.” It’s precisely because he does agree with me that I’m so miffed.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They weren’t being pretentious or haughty. They amended one of your statements because it was a little inaccurate, then agreed that your wider point is correct. Because, yes, “wanting to hold on to what you have earned” is indeed an ideologically driven position

            • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Let’s please keep this civil. I respectfully disagree, but I have no problem with you voicing your opinion. The issue is your assumption that the person who disagrees with you is a horrible individual, simply because they have a different opinion. I don’t even care who’s right at this point - we can debate an issue without insulting each other. And even if you’re enraged by it, hiding that fact and calmly countering their opinion with logic is far more effective at winning over an audience…

              Edit: Before any accusation of unfair treatment is made, I’d like to clarify that I disapprove of the original comment’s rhetoric as well - there was no good reason to insult conservatives (“greedy [expletive]”) like they did.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                What the fuck are you even talking about? Conservatives should be systemically and socially deplatformed and disenfranchised.

                My issue with the person I was speaking to was the haughty arrogance they led with, presuming to argue with me about… what? Nothing they said contradicted what I was saying; yet, they come at me like a debatelord?

                And now you have the arrogance to lecture me on the correct take ™? Literally cis white male energy. stfu

                • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There wasn’t any “haughty arrogance,” they were just adding on to what you said with their view, and (from my understanding) were attempting to be polite by clarifying how your point still stands. Not everything is an argument…

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        What exactly are older people afraid of losing? It’s not like even the farthest left politicians are in favor of doing anything more radical than raising taxes on people who are wealthier than the vast majority of boomers.

    • average_internet_enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      To what extent do you think education has played a role in allowing kids to critically analyse these types of people. Because in my history classes, we learned about ways people influenced others in nefarious ways and I’m wondering if kids see the same common pattern and know when to avoid.

      Just a thought 🤷

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I definitely think it’s played an important role. There’s a reason the right wing regularly attacks education. Seems to be a global thing, too – not just the US.

        Also just a thought, though!

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where do people live where they see this happening? Where I live, the young have moved significantly to the right compared to the older generation.

  • Decompose@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s gonna be hilarious watching you guys serve under the boot when all your money comes from the government that controls you. Enjoy!