• kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Still can’t believe it happened the first time.

        “Oh let’s just reuse the code and forget the hardware breakers on the machine it’ll be fine.”

        Like I have no ethics training but they even had a (human operated) control rod in the first chicago pile who trusts a radiation gun to a SOFTWARE toggle?

        • qfe0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It wasn’t collectively known that software was hard to do right at that time. If it always performed as intended it would have made for a less expensive and perfectly safe machine. It’s the textbook case in doing software wrong because there wasn’t one that happened before it.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I only learned about it from the “Well There’s Your Problem” podcast. Can’t believe my school never talked about it. We did hear all about Challenger though as well as a few other disasters where the lesson was “If you cut corners, or take chances, people can DIE”

  • tootbrute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still think we should try it on musk himself. Those monkeys just didnt have moxie

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I once had a chemistry professor who used to work as a senior drug researcher at a major pharmaceutical company. He often joked about how the company treated the monkeys used for testing far better than the PhDs. If a monkey suffered a negative reaction there was a major investigation. I’m incredibly surprised Musk can be killing monkeys left and right and hasn’t been thrown in jail.

  • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    We don’t in my country, and I’m 100% sure people would complain if there was one. Even if they attended it, it would go completely over their heads probably.

    A shitty capitalist society with deeply rooted individualism can’t be treated unless it’s done from the root of the problem.

      • torpak@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can have a bad government with any kind of economic system. As evidenced by the USA. They tend to commit most of their atrocities outside their own country but that doesn’t make them any better than china or russia.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A QUICK look at his profile shows he’s from Greece. Greece is not Communist. You’re so angry about something you’re yelling at the wrong people. Take a step back, breath, take a break from Lemmy. Even if what you’re saying is accurate, the 0-60 attitude toward someone you didn’t know anything about is literally crazy.

        • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A QUICK look at his profile shows he’s from Greece. Greece is not Communist

          What does that matter? This site is riddled with communists from all over the world

      • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lump me in with a group you hate because you disagree with me and say we’re all the same, that’s great for proving a point.

        Just remember to always miss the point and half read everything and you should be fine.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.

    Philosophy should be taught from very early. The hability to think, argue, relate to others and understand others while being capable of express your ideas is extremely important.

  • MartinXYZ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, I thought it was a meme similar to the old “Bush or chimp”-days, back when dubya was president, and was thinking: “surely they could have found a monkey that looked more like Elmo” but that’s not the point of these pictures, it seems 😕

  • Floey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally enjoy ethics as a subject, but has it been shown that studying ethics in uni actually leads to people behaving more ethically? I agree that ethics should be applied to science, but science should also be applied to ethics to determine the effective approach.

  • DrVortex@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You are confusing taking a class with actually having ethics. No amount of attending a lecture about ethics will convince you if you do not, as a basic premise agree with the ethical principle that loss of life is a bad thing. And to be very clear, ethical principles are subjective. There is no objectively right or wrong thing as far nature is concerned.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Classes don’t solve the problem entirely, but they’re a start and without them in this case a company so large and powerful that it has a space program and foreign policy planks is being guided by nothing but the intuition of someone who grew up spending money earned by child slaves and who thinks that scuttling an army’s mission in-progress is pacifism

    • And to be very clear, ethical principles are subjective. There is no objectively right or wrong thing as far nature is concerned.

      Deonotlogists and other Moral Realists and Universalists are shook

      But yeah, let’s imagine moral ontology was solved, and that moral relativism and nihilism are the only ethical theories around…

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That sounds like a fun paradox.

        Is “The only objective moral fact is that there is no objective morality” a truthful statement? Is it rational?

    • girthero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ethics class gives you tools to analyze a problem. Any good class is part of the philosophy department and leans on the classic philosphers approaches to analyze the problem. Many engineers would have no exposure to this otherwise and i think its a good part of any Universities’ engineering curriculum.

  • TheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because then you’ll be able to dismiss the ethics while being aware of the implications of your research.

    Disregarding the ethics while not knowing them grants you no extra points, whilst deliberately ignoring the ethical ramifications but understanding them gets you all the points