• RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      Provides a single point of failure for a large portion of the internet that nobody else has any control over?

      • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using cloudflare is more reliable than using your own stuff which is still an option that nobody chooses anymore because it’s better to choose cloudflare or something similar.

        I’m going to go ahead and assume you don’t work with internet security in any way, have no experience in web development, and have never attempted to provide web application services to more people than you can count on your fingers, but if you had, cloudflare is mana from heaven.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This persons main connection to the internet is hentai.

          Just… save your braincells.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        While that can indeed be considered an issue, the idea that this somehow makes the internet objectively worse is debatable.

      • taanegl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh no, centralising DNS and CDN traffic which are critical for the web and the internet into a single company is a bad idea?! Who knew!?!

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well no but I heard other people say it’s bad and give some half reasons why. Why do I need to understand the tech if I just want to be mad about it? /s

          Fr though cloudflare is a giant, but they give some hardcore protections to little guys like me. If they ever were bad to me I’d switch to akamai or something. Plus if we’re going to talk about monopolizing the web let’s talk about Google, Azure, and AWS.

  • primalmotion@lemmy.antisocial.ly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am baffled seeing so much cloudflare fanboys here…

    Cloudflare is everywhere, it sees everything, it holds everything, it has private keys for tons and tons of websites, it’s subject to the absence of any privacy law in the US, but they are “nice”. Wow.

    Google also was nice. It used to give you good results. Twitter also was nice.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hopped in this thread then shortly thereafter got redirected to a cloudfare bad gateway page. It’s a conspiracy.

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t listen to the nerds, cloudfare is trying to steal your soul and sell it to the Big Capybara industry.

  • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really think that on the list of worst single points of failure, DNS is not one of them. Given how easy it is to actually switch. And given that cloudflare outages are not nearly as common, The times they do happen usually are only for half an hour or so.

  • txmyx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What?? I thought cloudflare is good. Free Ddos protection, etc.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed, and I would say what cloudflare does for the internet (their work on the IETF, generally letting small sites stay alive without needing an SRE to worry about DDoS attacks, etc) outweighs the general negative possibility of them being a potential single point of failure

        • 30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well the admin of a site could opt out of using cloudflare for the time being, a user could do literally nothing. Errors in Cloudflare can easily take down their servers and therefore the CDN and access to like 20% of websites. And Bugs in Cloudflare can even leak user data.

          So cloudflare can grant DDOS Protection, CDNs and other exploiting protection, but can take down large parts of everything, temporarily or permanently.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Shhhh you can’t just be reasonable here. This guy watched a YouTube video, he knows what he’s talking about

          If cloudflare decided not to host my server I would have a bit of downtime, a couple of hours, but I’d be up again on someone else’s CDN tomorrow. I don’t think OP understands the role of cloudflare at all.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only because no one does what they do as well as they do it.

        If they had competition, that wouldn’t be the case. Sadly, there are very few other good guys out there…

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            There exists competition, they’ve just been doing it consistently well at a large scale for awhile.

            They’ve done nothing to prevent competition, because they’re legit AF. The competition just hasn’t put a dent in their market share because they’re excellent at what they do.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are benefits and costs. Cloudflare makes it easy to maintain high uptime as a small site sysadmin at the cost of free DDoS protection isn’t actually free. Cloudflare turns all users of websites that employ it into the products of surveillance capitalism

  • kn33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idk, but my homelab thanks it for the free ZTN and workers.

  • dill@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Throwback to when 1.1.1.1 dropped and we all loved couldflare

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally trying to figure out if Cloudflare or tailscale would be the best way to go. The memes have spoken

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t use memes to make decisions I’m just mad I can’t use the discord app on my desktop, can’t download manga from nhentai without jumping through hoops anymore, and have to solve 5 captchas in a row when I use a vpn which is all the time.

  • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I don’t know how any end user who doesn’t understand IT and wasn’t around before services like Cloudflare were available can say this. They objectively don’t have the information or experience to make the claim.

  • 57lchlover@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering how I (try) to do bug bounties for money, it’s bad for that, but otherwise, it’d probably be worse without it, considering how it seems a lot of developers seem to totally rely on it for reflected XSS protection.