• Nakedmole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Disgusting! Hipsters and other coffee snobs will really do anything just to feel more distinct, lmao.

    Edit: Comment confirmed by down-voting hipsters …

    • Duranie@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Hipsters and coffee snobs” aren’t the target audience and the vast majority have probably never tried it. It’s a flex for rich people that have more money than sense.

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not that expensive for one time test thing. I doubt anyone is drinking it as their daily drip coffee or something lol

      • veng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tried it in Bali and it wasn’t that expensive at all for a cup. It tasted weird though, could tell it had the taste of something that had been digested. 4/10 if I’m being generous, the teas there were great though.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a bag of this stuff but I hate coffee and poo so I haven’t tried it.

  • Pohl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Granted I don’t exactly run in the conspicuous consumption crowd, so maybe I’m out of the loop. Cope Luwak was a thing I heard about in the late 90s but have never seen in the world, ever.

    I suppose this is one of those products that has a reputation for being expensive so rich people buy it to flex and that creates some demand. Like gold pizzas or whatever other dumb shit gaudy nouveau riche assholes are doing to get attention.

    I’m sure there are places in the world where you can forage the shits and have something unique, but I highly doubt that what makes its way to fintech bros in manhattan has any real value at all. Just a cruel gimmick.

  • arefx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man looking at that shit I bet it feels amazing after pinching that out

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      113
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I read once that a major reason the coffee is supposed to be good, is that the animals (in the wild) tend to seek out the ripest, healthiest coffee beans to eat. They’re abundant (prior to human intervention), so why settle for less?

      But then we cage them and force-feed them whatever, so they’re just medium (or low) quality beans to start with. So even if you look past the cruelty, it’s not even the quality of coffee the reputation suggests.

      • Mangosniper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        1 year ago

        Iirc correctly the monkey cats ( or however they are called ) actually just prefer a specific coffee plant that is more rarely used as the ones used for the vast amount of coffee in the world ( e.g. robusta or arabica). However, if the beans of this variation are used directly, it tastes exactly the same. There is a scientific paper about this. Long story short: people are drinking shat out coffee for no good reason. What is even worse, it is tried to hold these monkey cats in cages to produce more of this coffee. Again for no good reason. But people fall for the marketing pr gang that the coffee is handpicked by those animals, digested and shat out and they would not go for “yeah we need just to use another plant” because it wouldn’t be so exklusive anymore…

  • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kopi luwak, also known as civet coffee, is a coffee that consists of partially digested coffee cherries, which have been eaten and defecated by the Asian palm civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus). The cherries are fermented as they pass through a civet’s intestines, and after being defecated with other fecal matter, they are collected.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopi_luwak

    It tastes smoother and is good. Their digestion of the beans strips the outer layer of the bean and changes the flavor.

    Is it better? Not really. I have had it in Bali from a farm and it was very smooth. Turkish coffee is better.

      • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s no more than animal cruelty, then any type of livestock farming. What the fuck do you think you get your bacon from? You think the pigs are happy in overcrowded, dirty farms? Do you think the chickens that lay eggs are happy to be confined inside a tiny cage covered in their own shit? You think cows like to eat feed corn day in and day out shoved full of antibiotics? Do you think any of the animals that we use for any type of products are happy to be slaughtered after being fattened up?

        If you’re gonna argue animal cruelty, you better stop eating all animal products, and become a vegan. Better yet why don’t you farm your own food and don’t buy anything that comes from modern agriculture because all that shit is covered in pesticides, GMO’s, and all kinds of other nasty shit.

        • random8847@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wtf dude. You give me all of this for a comment with four words?

          You either have some vested interests with kopi luwak or you have some serious anger issues. Either ways you need to calm your tits down.

          And FYI, all you said might be true but that’s still no reason for anyone to justify kopi luwak. Yes, there are a lot of other ways in which animal cruelty is happening in this world, but if everyone keeps blaming each other then none of it will ever stop.

        • Globulart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you really think the best way for the world to change is adopting an all or nothing attitude?

          What improves the planet more? 1 person becoming hardcore vegan or 1000 people eating meat one day a week instead of seven?

          See the problem?

          • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            31
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not at all. Random8847’s dipshit comment is just so smug and whiney.

            Every bit helps, however the corporations are really the ones we have to force to change.

            If you haven’t noticed having everybody recycle, hasn’t really done shit either. The corporations that pollute really environment cause in the majority of damage yet we’re telling regular every day people it’s their fault and they should do their part.

            • Globulart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You literally told them that if they’re gonna argue animal cruelty they’d better stop eating all animal products…

              Nobody mentioned corporations until you either, for all we know 8847 might do everything you said in your comment anyway.

            • Smoltech@lemmyunchained.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Most people can tell you exactly who (other than themselves) needs to change. This includes the people who work for the corporations, do business with the corporations and invest in the corporations.

              Separately, we can each only control our own choices.

              We delegate responsibility to the people who tell us (possibly correctly) that they’re required by law to make decisions based on short term profitability.

              • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                So what you’re essentially saying is the government needs to change the laws. Until the laws change, no one will do anything different. And since the government or essentially behold into the corporations, just not gonna happen.

                • Smoltech@lemmyunchained.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What I’m saying is that humans have free will, but have internalized concepts that tell they they’re stuck. That someone else must act.

            • random8847@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              A four worded comment is smug, whiney and dipshit? Man, something is really wrong with you. Get some help.

        • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah because the animals are fed exclusively coffee berrys and are extremely malnourished

          At least in normal farms it’s encouraged to properly feed the animals

          Also why are you so angry Who hurt you lol