• Vincent@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Legit one of the most underrated Firefox features that I use all the time: right-click -> Take Screenshot (or Ctrl+Shift+S). No need to look up the relevant node, just hover the relevant part with your cursor.

      • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        That doesn’t align itself to the dimensions of an element. The screenshot thingy even allows you to screenshot past the visible area for scrollable pages

        • LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And if you open Firefox’s responsive mode and give the webpage some considerable height, you can even take a full-page screenshot in one screenshot without having to stitch.

          • Vincent@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t even need to open Responsive Design Mode - when you select Take Screenshot, there are two buttons “Save visible” and “Save full page” in the top right-hand corner.

            • LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The issue with full page screenshot is that it cannot properly detect elements that are of type “fixed” or “sticky”, so the output comes out as messy. If you have a fixed/sticky footer element, it will be somewhere in the middle or topmost part of the screenshot.

              • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I usually select from bottom for those, that way the sticky ends up above the selected area when it sticks to the top.
                In other more complex cases your method is a good aproach though

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I miss the days when everything you saw on the internet was easily accessible in the temp folder, ready for you to rummage through.

  • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh. I like imgflip a lot and their watermark is super unintrusive, so I leave it to support them. If it was a worse watermark I’d feel no qualms about going around it but it’s small enough that I feel happy including it.

  • asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    imgflip devs should’ve known better. Just adding a img element on another img element won’t do. You gotta generate them together and add only one img element where the watermark is edited into the image. Too lazy to generate the appropriate image (with or without watermark) depending on users subscription status on the server side ig.