An era of the internet is ending, and we’re watching it happen practically in real time. Twitter has been on a steep and seemingly inexorable decline for, well, years, but especially since Elon Musk bought the company last fall and made a mess of the place. Reddit has spent the last couple of months self-immolating in similar ways, alienating its developers and users and hoping it can survive by sticking its head in the sand until the battle’s over. (I thought for a while that Reddit would eventually be the last good place left, but… nope.) TikTok remains ascendent — and looks ever more likely to be banned in some meaningful way. Instagram has turned into an entertainment platform; nobody’s on Facebook anymore…
I hate it how TikTok is still not banned in most Western countries since it’s a shameless CCP-owned propaganda tool and a scary one at that.
That was a good read, thanks for sharing.
I’m on the fence on this one since I’ve mixed views on the social media era of the net. It was great, until we switched from usernames to users (Facebook charging ahead, Google following soon after).
Controversial, but I don’t mind the odd clearly marked advert targeted towards the person my browser says I am (i.e. a gamer looking for games, not someone who should be getting life insurance!) - if it isn’t invasive and is showing me something I want I’ll probably click it and take a look.
What we’ve seen evolving alongside social media is malvertising by another name - adverts that are using your desire to skip them to trick you into triggering a click. Cable-levels of advertising when listening to music - my radio offers less ads and better music sometimes. Last time I clicked an ad at work by mistake (playing a video for the class), it set of the antivirus.
The prevelance of linking online presence to your “real life”, and tying in adverts to that? That’s what killed it for me, and likely killed it for everyone else too. Bring back the days of MySpace and Geocities, and those plain banner ads that harmed no-one!
There’s an opportunity in this mess to re imagine the digital commons for the better. What does an online social space look like when it privileges the needs of the community over the needs of capital?
I’ve been wondering the same thing and I’m looking forward to having my questions answered.
Corporations shouldn’t get sole control of the benefits of the records of public discourse, those should be freely available to everyone.
The only thing that I was worried about with the alternatives was the websites being spammed with alt right content. Reddit users are not as unhinged as YouTube comments, Facebook, twitter etc. Im glad there’s no alt right content on lemmy. So I’m pretty happy here.
Also I don’t want to have a free speech debate. If you want to post edgy shit go to twitter. For me personally its not something I like. Im not really interested in having a debate. Just personal preference
Days late, but my first ever Fediverse experience was a Linux dude’s pro-trans post that was cool, but then the comments were spammed with “N-word bot”( not written that way) shouting exactly what the name suggested, with tons of people cheering it on. It was the main reason I avoided it over here for a bit.
So theres absolutely shitty people here too, as in any community, but therer does seem to be less so far.
There is absolutely alt-right content on lemmy. That said, it is mostly drowned out. I saw several alt-right communities when I joined lemmy 3 weeks ago with only 1 member. These people were trying to build echo chambers by themselves. Other lemmy users would come in and start posting articles from regular media which pretty much shut down. I think it’s great that users here don’t want to allow it to be a safe haven for that kind of stuff, unlike the numerous other “free speech” websites that actively encourage it.
Oh it’s here, but luckily it’s pushed to one side and easily blocked.
It needs to stay that way
This is not really a big worry imo. In the “golden age” of the internet, alot of people were not on it. Everything slowly degrades with added population. It’s not even just a social media problem. Small companies are agile but as they grow to be giants, they die off. This is just the normal lifecycle of pretty much anything involving large groups of people. I think people will always find a way to form communities and move from platform to platform as neccessary. The thing about maintaining a special group is that you don’t neccessarily want it to be super accessible
TikTok remains ascendent
Which is a damn shame, because it’s unusable for literally anything other than sharing alienated, one-off videos. TikTok are masters at keeping people inside their app and nowhere else.
I actually really like this take. Maybe this is just social media growing up, becoming more focused and self aware. The fediverse is currently super rough around the edges, but it really knows what it is. That’s more than can be said for pretty much any of the big social networks.
I’m so down for an open, transparent Internet with focused communities and small websites.
I am hopeful that a sizable chunk of people are smart enough to see the writing on the wall with corporate owned media and will inevitably follow to the non-corporate-controlled places (like the fediverse model). The danger will be the model falling over as the temptation to centralise, control, and exploit becomes higher. The lemmy model only works if there isn’t a dominate server with a large proportion of content right? What happens if lemmy.world gets big then just decides to de-federate? It’s just reddit all over again.
If a server defederates, users can stay or go. Maybe the users of that server decide that there’s enough content locally sand they prefer to use what is a private forum. And if they don’t, they migrate.
I think rather than a possible disaster, this is an example of the principle that we should build the web not with the intention that systems never break, but that they break better. Like letting small, healthy brush fires maintain forests instead of trying to prevent them until they explode catastrophically.
This is also a major concern of mine. We ideally don’t want any single instance to become dominant enough that they can afford to de-federate without much repercussion. Excessive consolidation also leads to higher cost pressures, which in turn incentivize revenue generation to fund the operations and potentially compensation for effort. Keeping everything distributed would help avoid many pitfalls.
That’s why each instance should be donation funded
Hey guys remember Monday is no meta Monday! We all need to do our part to create content
Here’s my hope as a 40-something who came of age when the internet was just taking off.
I REALLY HOPE this is the push we need to move away from corporate-owned social media. I have high hopes for federated platforms and forums that are much more like what the internet was when it started (but better because now we have mobile devices).
I realize a lot of people see social media as being some evil thing, but we also fail to realize how much good it has done. Marginalized communities have come together online and formed real movements. People living with health conditions have been connected to one another for support and also life-changing resources and care. People who were isolated because of disability found communities.
I would like to see old-fashioned blogs and RSS make a comeback. I’d like to see forums and federated sites like Lemmy take off. I’d like to see social media sites that have been given way too much weight in society collapse. I don’t think government or reputable media outlets should ever be using a corporate for-profit entity as a means for distributing information.
My worry now, as a bunch of us leave Reddit (the “non-social media” social media site that gave us all some internet community without the horribleness of FB/IG, etc), is that now that these companies have cornered their “gateways to the internet,” there is no wrenching them back. Whether we like it or not, the bulk of people are…well, kinda stupid. They like reality TV and don’t fast forward through commercials and they watch big bang theory and never question if companies’ existences are a net positive. They just take them as a given.
Americans in particular seem to be pretty guilty of this, because our lifestyle lends itself to being spoon fed. It’s easier, makes life simpler…it’s just “the way things are done.” So while I’m hoping this is the beginning of us taking the internet back…I just find it hard to grasp onto any hope for big, positive change. I just feel like we’ve been beaten into submission and as the planet burns to a crisp, capitalism is just gripping the reigns tighter than ever because they know this should be about the time that people start to buck. But…we just don’t. I think even they’re surprised.
It’s hard for social media to go away for good.
But reddit will be like Facebook. Some people go there, but to the vast amount of people it’s a joke.
Hell, Fark is still going
But reddit will be like Facebook. Some people go there, but to the vast amount of people it’s a joke.
Facebook currently has 2 billion monthly users, 4x more than reddit.
“Some” people go to reddit. For the majority of people (facebook), reddit is a joke.
The perception that facebook is dead is just as misinformed as the perception that reddit is will be “like facebook”. Reddit has not even reached facebook status, and probably never will.
I do wonder though - and just to be clear, I really am just curious, not trying to argue because I don’t know shit about this - but I wonder how many of those monthly users only use it begrudgingly because it’s the only reliable way to get/stay in contact with a tech-illiterate relative.
The best you can do for now is to inform people. Bring it up into conversation with your friends and family. Explain it in a way thats easy to understand and show the positives of Lemmy and other fediverse platforms. Also contribute as much as you can to the fediverse because it is nothing without active communities.
Lemmy is a good start…
I REALLY HOPE this is the push we need to move away from corporate-owned social media.
We have actually regressed significantly on that and we could easily go back to before it existed. Before Reddit there was (and still is) a decentralized discussion network called Usenet. It was extremely well designed and has none of the design flaws that Fedverse has. All newsgroups were automatically merged across all instances. Your UI showed you only new comments and submissions, in the newsgroups that you subscribed to. You could mark a comment tree as killed, and then you wouldn’t see any new comments in that particular comment tree even while still subscribed to the newsgroup. You generally had your choice of moderated or unmoderated group for each topic, with tens of thousands of topics.
The only reason people don’t use it anymore is because all the free servers disappeared. But now I see all these new free Fedverse servers, which is great, but how come no new free Usenet servers? They could be ad supported. I started using the internet in 1982 and Fedverse feels like a reinvention of the decentralization wheel, which a bunch of design flaws the original has already solved long ago. If there were free servers again, and perhaps a new mobile client, Usenet use would skyrocket as people personally experience how easy and seamless it is.
I’ve never tried Usenet, but I’ve heard little bits about it here and there. What’s a good way to give it a try?
you can view pretty much the complete history at groups.google.com. if there any usenet group still active they would show up there as well but it’s a wasteland as far as i can tell. pity, i spent billions of hours on it back in the day.
here’s a group i was active on back in the day, if you can filter it by just stuff from the 1990’s you might have an idea of what it was like to use it. (of course, it was mostly terminal/console based text readers back then, web browsers were new and scary.) https://groups.google.com/g/rec.music.synth
There are commercial Usenet servers you can access for $5-10 bucks/month. You can find them by google search.
For a Usenet client you can look here.
It was extremely well designed and has none of the design flaws that Fedverse has.
True. Your UI can’t be poorly designed if it doesn’t even exist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Usenet_newsreaders
Usenet has more clients than anyone else.
Each social media giant is slowly becoming a walled garden, only allowing you to play inside, but not permitting anything out. We saw it with Facebook, now Twitter. Next up, Reddit is now disallowing any outside access without a tollgate.
Lemmy I see more like the German Schrebergarten. These are plots of land, usually not wanted by the major players, or on the outskirts of town. You get a plot portion out of this and build your garden/community out of this. There are no walls in Lemmy, but fences with gates, and you decide which other gardeners have access. There are other plots of land in other parts of the city, and you also decide which of those gardens you’ll trade seeds and plants with.
I hope we’ll never put up walls.
So glad to see the era of profit driven social media die.
You can say that again, Adm. Shat.
I’m not so sure this is a decline of social as much as decline in the control of large corporate interests. Lemmy is getting going well from what I can see. There will be issues but Reddit did as it grew and Twitter made the fail whale meme for their issues. The internet was pretty awesome in the 90s when none of these large companies even existed.
I mean I am excited for the potential the fediverse has, but I do wonder how long until it becomes enshitified too. Every great new invention that serves the needs of the people always goes downhill at some point. Remember that television networks used to be an amazing platform for all our needs.
You don’t seem to really understand the word enshitification. It’s not just “things getting shittier” - it refers specifically to the capitalist pressures that are exerted on private platforms and services that need to chase investor capital to scale and survive. The reason enshitification happens is because they are operating under a model that needs to first entice users with a high value product that is subsidized by venture capital, but that when that dries up the pressures come first to appease the investors at the expense of the users and then the owners at the expense of the investors. Fediverse for all its croaks and groans in these early stages is specifically designed to be decentralized and scalable by small clusters of users. It’s user owned and managed. When one cluster shows signs of degrading, you can move to another. I’m bullish on fediverse and decentralized platforms like this on being that solution and it’s not clear yet that they suffer the same inevitable enshitification that legacy platforms do.
No I understand the word. What I’m saying is that as the fediverse grows, and large communities develop, there will be large corps will want a piece of the action. They operate with money, they down build or create, they buy. What would you do, you living you life as you are now, but decide to take up running an instance. Assume that instance grows very large and starts getting worldwide recognition, and some corporate affiliated executive invites you to meet and they give you a very real offer of $84,000,000,000 to give the instance to them. They promise to add the features you’ve wanted to implement but was struggling to, offer a team of people to help with your bot and spam issues. Would you turn that down? Idk about you, but I could definitely use 84 million dollars. I hate corps with a passion, I believe they ruin everything they touch, but I could do the things I want with that kind of money.
And so what do the community’s of thousands upon thousands members do when their admin sells out? Do they move? Can the entire community just up and move to another instance and keep the same engagement? Would they even want to? The corpo’s just implemented the features they’ve been asking for for years, they can’t be that bad right? Besides we like it here. I’m sure it’ll be fine, right? Besides, Amazon already ownes one of the other largeest instance, and we’re def not moving to the one meta runs, what’s one more?
And of course once the large corps have thrown all their money at the newest popular thing, they repeat the process. All of them Switch from growth focus to monetization focus and everything turns to shit.
There are other options, there are smaller instances that people could move to, and that probably will happen, but the effect will be similar. People who were all gathered in once place, enjoying one thing, get splintered into lots of other smaller groups, with a newer differenter thing. And it starts over again.
The nice thing is that if things do become shit on one instance, the rest just disconnect. The lack of total control over the system by one entity ensures that there is no complete capture to enable the enshitification from taking root and destroying what is good about it.
I am hopeful, but I am cautiously sceptical. I remember hearing about cryptocurrency taking off in 2011 and all about how it was decentralized and was immune to corruption etc and then a decade later seeing SBF types in the news.
Crypto does have all those benefits, but without wide enough adoption, there’s genuinely nothing valuable about it. Just like real money. It is immune to a certain kind of corruption (manipulating the money supply) but very weak to another kind (making your own worthless currency to scam people with).
Even if we got society to go full crypto acceptance, governments would do all they can to control it. Manipulating the money supply is how you get every politician’s favorite thing ever; an economy fueled through the debt of future generations.
The fediverse has the same conceptual benefits and the same problem of needing large groups of people to grow, but there is a big difference: having spaces for online communication not controlled by single actors is valuable in and of itself. Whether enough people find it valuable enough to participate is up to them, but the concept, at least, is incredibly appealing especially at this current moment.
deleted by creator
The difference here is that there is no supposed or even desired value from the people participating here. We’re not all trying to get rich off of this, nor are we trying to replace all forms of communication here like many crypto purists wish would happen with Bitcoin replacing the dollar. Nothing rides on this being a success, perpetual growth isn’t necessary, and defederation doesn’t mean that our communities wouldn’t still have worth to us.
All this consolidation of all the engagement to three huge platforms was never a good thing anyway
The big social media platforms made it easy to join and easy enough for your parents and friends to use even if they weren’t techies. The Fediverse isn’t hard to join, in the sense you can easily create an account some place, but it tends to be narrowly focused. Trying to explain to grandma that she needs to join a Mastodon instance for sewing but a different instance for knitting is going to be difficult when she can stay on Facebook and have both in one place. Something like Lemmy does help in these cases in the sense that there are multiple communities available to you from a single account. But that “everyone I know is here” feeling seems like it’s going to be a thing of the past.
she needs to join a Mastodon instance for sewing but a different instance for knitting
Am I missing something? I thought Mastodon worked just like lemmy where you can subscribe cross-instance
You can subscribe to an account on another instance, but you can’t get all of the posts on another instance without having an account on that instance.
