Exciting news for who? Only the site owner is excited that a free resource now requires a subscription

“Yay! Now I have to pay another subscription! I’m so excited! Let’s celebrate with them!” - nobody

  • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    So what pisses me off in these cases is this: they didn’t contribute with the data. They’re a convenient aggregator, I give them that, but the data came from third parties. If you want to start charging for convenient access to the data you should at least make all data before you started charging available in a bulk download for free.

    • dellish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So… They’re following the Reddit business model? Let’s see how that works out.

    • beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They aren’t charging for convenient access to the data though, they are charging for bulk access. The limitations of the new API should not impact people casually pulling in subtitles with VLC when they watch a movie, which is the purpose the API was intended to fulfill.

    • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      You just need to move to the new API, which is free, the old one is still available temporarily if you pay

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yarr, this be objectionable, but inconsequential.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        In which case the ADA provides extensive coverage that demands reasonable accommodations. Hence why reddit backtracked and allowed a few apps free API access (eg RedReader, which is very clunky but still works).

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Extensive =/= perfect. At least there’s a chance of getting reasonable accommodation. With sex discrimination there’s almost no hope outside of employment.

            Also I’m sure you’re speaking with a dollop of hyberbole and overlooking a bunch of accommodation provided up front.

  • Slurpey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean to be realistic, Whisper (the audio to text AI ) linked with chatGPT can subtitle anything in real time, translated in any language, in very high quality…

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wait… “Ad-Free Subtitles”? I have never even used or heard of this service, but that just feels like an “insult to injury” or “annoy you into paying” abuse? Am I wrong?

    Please tell me that this is not some auto-subtitling service that is going to cause ads to be inserted into the subtitles for other ads or something? Like, how do ads in subtitles even work?

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They add one ad at the beginning like “visit example.com” inside the subtitle file

      But luckily there aren’t many companies that want to be associated with piracy* so in most cases it’s blank a generic “advertise here contact mail@example.com

      I remember only a campaign that lasted over a year, a service that promotes legal streaming services, filmamo.it

      * note: why I said “associated with piracy”: those files are going to be used with pirated video files and in most cases are pirated too as they’ve been extracted from a DVD or a streaming service without a license from the copyright holders. Once I saw a guide “how to use external subs with Netflix” for the rare edge cases where the viewer is watching a content via VPN and his sub language is missing, but those are very rare. Not to mention that for MPAA there’s no difference between just torrenting a movie or paying a subscription to Netflix in another country via VPN: for them is all piracy and they want to stop both.

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Fucking MPAA. Quite possibly the most corrupt pile of dickheads to ever assemble. They blatantly ignored their own raring guidelines for decades until they decided they got tired of being called out on it and changed them to be so vague that they would he allowed to justify any rating, then started accepting “donations” from production companies to get the ratings they wanted.

    • Leg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      For like a month. Then you need to be important and pay them.

      Edit: for the current/legacy API. The new API is free, but limited.

      • baldissara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, but the limit seems to be more than appropriate for most people anyway, so I think their pricing model is pretty reasonable

        • piexil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s also $12 a year ($15 normally).

          It’s a small price to pay to ensure everything on your Plex server has subtitles. Subtitling stuff and hosting it isn’t free.

          • dotMonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Exactly. I’m all for hating on subscriptions, but this is more than a fair price. Just eat at home instead of buying out for one day a year and it pays for it lol

  • RiQuY@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    They should rename the site to PaywalledSubtitles.

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    well it has been deprecated for a few years, and they’re basically asking you to play for continued support.
    they have a new REST api, but you still need the old one, pay up because otherwise there’s no motivation to keep it around.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      This isn’t enshittification, they deprecated the api a long time ago, now they have a shiny new one that’s free. You need to switch over or pay up. API changing isn’t something unique in programming.

  • Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    A proper REST API sounds like exciting news to me, and I’m sure anyone who needs to interact with their APIs…