• Kosta554@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Good thing it is banned in the EU or at least in the Netherlands 🇳🇱

    EDIT: It is not banned it needs to be approved by GDPR

    • BattBoi244@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seeing some articles reference the Digital Market Act, which seems to be around large platforms online, which seems to be more akin to competition law.

      They did launch it in the UK, which still has all the GDPR laws/principles, just outside the EU context. Then again maybe that means any enforcement activities by the UK would start from scratch. Or maybe the lack of recent UK enforcement activity encouraged them

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It isn’t banned, they just haven’t gone through GDPR approval yet

        • jd3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thank you for this integrity and wisdom. You win the Internet from long ago today! Lol

          • Kosta554@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            No point in fighting if my sources are not correct or It must be a Dutch thing that we must correct ourselves haha.

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yup pretty much, they wouldn’t have made the regulatory requirements, so they chose not to release in the EU yet (i.e. not blocked in the EU). GDPR “approval” might not be the best term, but that’s how I’ve seen it represented in tech articles so far.

          The thing holding them back is sharing data cross app from what I’ve heard. Since Threads runs off Instagram accounts right now, but it’s still it’s own app, it’s sort of in a legal gray area, and given that they want to extend it to non-Instagram users as well it probably makes more sense to go for that first and then move for the EU release after they’ve made it fully GDPR compliant.

          • BattBoi244@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            They already don’t comply with it with FB lol, they have just got away with it for so long, believe it was mainly the the Irish regulators fault who is either some form of captured, anti-privacy or being bribed.

            But it went to the EU level board, not sure how all that works, who finally hit then with a $1.2 billion fine and the demand they come into compliance. So maybe it’s off the back of that as well has gave them some pause

            • Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              So I work in Canadian tech as a Data Engineer and have some experience there and the 1.2B fine they got hit with is actually a lot more nuanced than it’s been represented and pretty problematic in general.

              Probably going to get downvoted for even linking it, but their response is unfortunately the only write-up I’ve seen that actually goes into detail:

              https://about.fb.com/news/2023/05/our-response-to-the-decision-on-facebooks-eu-us-data-transfers/

              The TLDR is that the Court of Justice of the EU invalidated the original form of data transfer for data from the EU to US, so everyone switched over to SCCs knowing there was legal uncertainty there, but with promises from the EU and US that they’d “figure it out” and come up with a joint decision on how to transfer data safely. The GDPR jumped the gun for a reason that nobody really knows, and slapped Meta with a fine that’s making thousands of companies who are basically forced to do the same thing (since no actual legal option exists) shit their pants.

    • RoadieRich@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Threads is Meta’s (Facebook/Instagram’s) Twitter replacement, which they want to connect to the Fediverse, but most of the Ferdiverse doesn’t want them to.

      • 5SpeedDeasil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Interesting. So I assume it’s suppose to be going up against Mastadon then? I honestly would be fine with it as long as they open source there server code but let’s be real, they won’t

        • Matt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Against” isn’t really the right word, as you don’t really compete on the fediverse.

          All the platforms on the fediverse work together by design, the introduction of more micro blogs is good for Mastodon and the rest; there’s already so many of them and you can talk to them through Mastodon, which is the way it should be.

          • z3k3@lemmy.pt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It is a meme using Metallica’s Don’t Tread on Me from the Black Album with the snake cover.

  • Televise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Threads when isolated from this community: GOOD.

    Threads when federated with this community: NOT GOOD.

    It is your choice whether to use it or not. The Fediverse is like the Linux of social media, I like it more here and on other fedi apps than on the corporate social media.

    • jkure2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The amount of people who believe themselves and their interests safe from the totalizing influence of these companies really breaks my mind.

      Threads when isolated from this community: STILL NOT GOOD

      • SneakyWaffles@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Am I the only one who’s confused why it’s such a bad thing for Threads to federate?

        It’s just essentially be a really big instance. People can turn it off or go to instances that defederate from threads if they hate it.

        My potentially controversial (at least here) take is that the Fediverse needs a few mainstream players like Threads to flourish long-term. It’ll be some serious mainstream attention on what federated services offer, and also a shallow end of the pool that normal people can start their Fediverse journey in

        • Digester@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          @SneakyWaffles @jkure2 let them federate. I have nothing against that because it doesn’t take away the possibility to block them either on a federal level or to an individual level. If you don’t wanna see Thread’s content you can opt out at any time.

          I like how versatile the fediverse is and I welcome other platforms.