• AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna90336

    good thing we put so much effort into saving a billionaire with a deathwish while we let all these poor people die. Good thing so many peasants were more interested in a billionaire’s life than our brothers and sisters the billionaires oppress and exploit out of proud, insatiable, sociopathic greed.

    • chunktoplane@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks for sharing the link. Fewer deaths is definitely less tragic than more deaths, but less tragedy makes it easier to talk about - it’s not a judgement.

  • Adella1961@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    I find it incredibly sad that the teen, Sulemon Dawood, only agreed to go on the trip to appease his father. Left on his own, the teen was not interested in going. And although I’m saddened to hear all five perished, the four older adults made their own independent decisions to take the risk. I feel an extra sense of sadness for the teen though who was influenced by his father into going.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/shahzada-suleman-dawood-titanic-sub-imploded-b2362670.html

  • Johandea@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    “catastrophic loss of pressure”?

    Wouldn’t it be a catastrophic increase of pressure? They were at the bottom of the ocean.

    • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, it’s catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber, the thing that keeps the squishy humans inside separate from the tons-per-square-inch of water outside.

        • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes, that’s correct. The pressure chamber is the hull that separates the 1 atm of pressure inside from the 375 atm of water outside. I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.

          • Johandea@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            Turns out I’m to drunk to read. Sorry, I misread the headline. Man, I hate english writing words separately…

            • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              No worries, had a feeling it was something like that. It also doesn’t help that there’s a line break between “pressure” and “chamber” (at least on my screen), so it’s an easy mistake to make.

              • itsYaBoyNoodles@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 years ago

                Look at this interaction, just look at it. Everyone playing nice, nothing toxic in sight. If this were Reddit we’d have started a flamewar.

                I freaking love Beehaw, stay classy Beeple.

      • Johandea@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        No? It’s the hull of the vessel that counters the outside pressure. The main reason to use a submarine, instead of scuba diving, is to shield yourself from the pressure. If the inside pressure was even close the the outside, which it would have to be to keep it from imploding, you wouldn’t need the submarine at all; you’d be crushed regardless.

        At the depth of the Titanic, roughly 4000 m, the water pressure is ~400 bar. The record for highest survived air pressure is around 70 bar. That was for 2 hours, breathing a special gas mixture of 99,5% hydrogen and 0,5% oxygen.

        I find it highly unlikely that they’d rely on the inside air pressure for anything other than the comfort of the passengers.

        • ATGM 🚀@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The hull needs to have high pressure internally, which adds to the strength of a vehicle like this.

  • DSLeMaster@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    With all the red flags I’ve seen in the 4 days of them looking for it, I cannot understand how anyone spending that kind of money on this didn’t see enough to back the fuck off.

    • walkingears@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      It does seem like Oceangate advertised in a misleading way, emphasizing claims of safety and compliance with safety standards. There’s also probably an unfortunate bias, of sorts, of “rich and powerful man saying something is safe in a confident and authoritative voice so it must be true”

    • DiachronicShear@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      i’m sorry but the cables on the OUTSIDE of the sub? hell even just LOOKING at the damn thing. And once I saw the controller I’d be out so quick.

      • femboy_link.mp4@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The controller was probably the least problematic aspect of the whole thing, and that’s saying something given that they were relying on fucking Bluetooth at the bottom of the ocean.

    • D2L@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      If it were me or one of my loved ones, aside from rescue, this may be the best outcome.

  • ⚡⚡⚡@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    They went down there, where hundreds of people from the titanic died in a boat called titan…

    Maybe in the future, some quadrillionaires will go down there explore the titan in a boat called tit.

    (Too soon?)

  • Mcballs1234@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel sorry for thecreww members who were just there to drive the thing, but the rich I could care less and I’m pretty hungry

    • mrcory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      The CEO/founder was the operator.

      I still don’t think this is anything to celebrate though.

  • Valliac@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    A sudden implosion is the best-case scenario, given how else it could have gone.

  • zombiepete@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Better that than suffocating to death slowly on the bottom of the ocean. Sympathy for their families.

      • aport@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nobody drowned, they were instantaneously squished under the massive pressure of the deep sea

      • RadioRat (he/they)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not actually correct in this case. Hypoxia is only painless if oxygen is displaced with an inert gas like nitrogen. Our bodies detect low oxygen indirectly via chemoreceptors that detect the increase in blood acidity (respiratory acidosis) induced by high carbon dioxide (hypercapnia).

        As humans breathe in a sealed environment, oxygen is replaced with CO2. Hypercapnia is what causes the panic and pain of drowning prior to inhalation of water. Consciousness is lost mere seconds after water inhalation.

        Drowning and hypercapnic asphyxiation are essentially the same experience in terms of suffering.

        Secondary outcomes and resuscitation are a different story, but are obviously not applicable here.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think I read something about the sub having a CO2 scrubber which would mean their bodies wouldn’t feel the lack of oxygen due to what you explained, but I know nothing about this.

          • RadioRat (he/they)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            This is a good question! Not sure which precise units they had and in what quantity, but given the size of the Titan (no way they can support liquid regenerative system with their size and energy reserve constraints), they would have had canister containing solid CO2 adsorbent with a fan (example).

            Without the fan, it’s not going to be very effective since CO2 has to actually pass over the solid. Passive diffusion is not going to move the same volume of CO2 over the solid even if the solid was removed from the housing. Even if they didn’t run out of battery, The solid has a maximum capacity - about 7.5 kg for the unit linked above. Even with reserve capacity, an average human exhales ~0.97 kg of CO2 per day.

            O2 to CO2 exchange via respiration is mole for mole (you do lose a little mass in carbon and water just by breathing!). Atmospheric CO2 is 0.041% (410 ppm) and O2 is a hair under 21% and that’s the standard to which life support systems are held. Humans lose consciousness at around 3.7% oxygen, but experience hypercapnia at >6% CO2. (Physiology nerds - I converted from the partial pressures in mmHg to % of 1 atm for comprehension)

            So in this hypothetical scenario, hypercapnia would definitely precede loss of consciousness due to anoxia.

      • Recant@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well the fact that they are saying it was a catastrophic implosion leads to the thought that it was crushed in a very short amount of time maybe even a few seconds so I doubt they had time to drown.

        • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s not a few seconds, it’s a very small fraction of a second. The Thresher imploded in 1/20th of a second at 730 meters. We don’t know for sure how far down Titan was when it imploded, but based on the time they lost signal, I’m guessing around 3500 meters, so we’re talking about 4-5 times as much force. Plus the hull was made of extremely brittle carbon fiber, so it wouldn’t buckle at all, it would just collapse all at once. It’s hard to overstate how much force we’re talking about; at that depth, it’s about equivalent to building the Empire State building out of lead and sitting it on top of the ship with no other supports.

          It’s not just that they didn’t have time to drown; it would have imploded so quickly that they would have been dead before their brains even had time to process that something was happening.

      • elizardbeth@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        They would have died (or at the very least, lost consciousness) from the pressure long before they drown.

  • snrkl@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    For those wondering about James Cameron’s comments, I’d thoroughly recommend watching the Deep Sea Challenger documentary. It is enthralling. I have a friend who actually worked on the sub and went on the expedition with Cameron. In his words: “to underestimate the safety requirements is, put simply, to die.”

  • Nooch@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    I do feel awful for their families. But I feel more awful for the refugees in the Mediterranean.

  • salarua@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 years ago

    i’m just glad this whole thing is over. what a sick world we live in where five billionaires in a submarine sparks wall to wall coverage and five hundred migrants gets barely a passing mention

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Definitely shows where the media’s priorities lie, ie the wealthy lamenting the loss of their own

    • The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In my country, they started the newscast 2h earlier than usual just to say “Debris were found; may be unrelated”. I think they initially went live earlier because the conference was meant to happen earlier and they couldn’t wait to show it; it had to be live. When it got postponed, they spent 2h just talking about it with commentators and different specialists; all just theorizing what could have happened, and whether there might still be a chance for rescue or not, and repeating that there would be a conference “so stay tuned!”.

      But refugees you barely hear about.

      I get this story has some more “thrill” and novelty to it, being a submarine near the titanic and all, but this really is ridiculous.

      • Thrashy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The more prosaic explanation – bordering on “banality of evil,” but still – is that a story about a rickety overloaded fishing boat full of desperate war refugees sinking in the Mediterranean has become a fairly common occurrence in the years since the Arab Spring turned into a decade of civil wars, but whiz-bang private subs going missing while diving on the most famous shipwreck of all time is unusual. Horses vs. zebras and all that.

        • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yup. Also why do people want more media attention on this. It’s not going to stop the human traffickers from overloading their boats. It’s not that no one did anything. The coast guards and navies of multiple countries acted as soon as they became aware the boat sank and as a result saved a ton of people. Would people really be happier if we had end to end coverage of a disaster that had no mystery to it just an all too common occurrence of lives being lost fleeing Africa and the Middle East dangerously.

    • maximus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it’s more how uncommon the situation is, the complexity and odds of the rescue, and the ‘ticking clock’ effect that came from them only having 96 hours of oxygen. Stories need to be interesting to get mass media coverage (look at the Tham Luang cave rescue - none of them were billionares), and, as incredibly bleak as this sentence sounds, a boat capsizing with hundreds onboard just isn’t interesting enough.

      • dope@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Interesting enough to get a gaggle of billionaires in a bolted metal box and explore the capsized boat. 🤨

      • walkingears@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s also a sort of morbid fascination and curiosity that comes from a situation this unique. I definitely agree that of course the sinking refugee ship should have gotten far more help and attention, but I think the “morbid curiosity” element is certainly part of why this got so much attention. The whole situation of paying a fortune for visiting the Titanic in a janky unregulated submersible and then vanishing underwater is…bizarre, and surreal, in a way that captures attention

        • Enfield [he/him]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I still can’t get over how janky that tin can felt to me when I was looking into it. Not even getting into the safety cuts, the whole picture felt cheap. The Poop-Bucket a foot away and audibly masked with turning up the music; five people sitting cross-cross applesauce on basically an exercise mat in cramped real estate; working with two desktop monitors and a Logitech controller; the CEO explicitly bragging about cutting corners and breaking rules.

          I think that even if the sub more closely resembled expectations and even if the CEO was on top of safety, the story would’ve still been a quick sell on mass media. A sub exploring the Titanic going missing invokes the kind of visuals and what-ifs that start to depart reality and arrive to movie territory. Add the schadenfreude to it and the minivan as described above and that movie becomes a sort of dark humor comedy blended with horror.

          I think that this story makes for a good sideshow to gawk at. It’s also a good vehicle to laugh at the rich. The shipwreck in the Mediterranean, as much as it demands our attention in contrast, is much more grounded in reality—hard and painful realities—that I think a sizable chunk of society gets squeamish about. It demands we answer questions and take actions that certain someones would rather we don’t.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Agree, I don’t think much of the coverage at all had to do with “Oh no, look at the poor rich people in trouble!” And had a lot more to do with the potential for a Hollywood style life-saving mission.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Were all of them billionaires? I can’t imagine the people actually operating the thing were, surely, just the passengers?

  • Toxic_Tiger@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 years ago

    It sucks that 4 other people were killed by the CEOs own hubris. But at least they don’t appear to have suffocated to death. At that depth, it would have been instantaneous.

        • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Unlikely, implosion makes a very different sound. It could be almost anything. Might have been parts of the wreckage getting moved around by currents and knocking together, might have been some undersea life bumping into the wreck of the Titanic, might have been completely unrelated.

        • Pigeon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          The phrase “red herring” originated because the u.s. navy mistook fish noises for incredibly stealthy russia submarines for years :P

          Could be anything

          • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            “Red herring” as a term originates from the early 1800s. Although you’re absolutely right on the larger point; the ocean is noisy and sound carries, there’s no telling what it was.

        • Favor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          Implosions require a lot of pressure, so whatever took them out did it while they were still deep.

          My guess is it happened as they approached extreme depths. Metal fatigue and poor design aren’t always instantly apparent, but they stack up exponentially. The same way the CEO had piloted it down before he did again, then BANG and done. Would have been practically instant and without warning.

          • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Worth pointing out that only the end caps were metal (and titanium at that, which is already brittle), while the bulk of the hull was carbon fiber, which doesn’t gradually fatigue bend and buckle, it fails catastrophically.

            Also, they lost signal at 1 hour and 45 minutes into a ~2 hour dive. I don’t know how much their dive rate varied, but if we assume it was effectively constant, that puts them at ~3500 meters at LOS.

            Combining those two points, two to three years after building the ship, they identified cyclic fatigue in the carbon fiber that reduced their calculated rating to 3000 meters. Since that’s not enough to get to Titanic, they completely rebuilt the ship, two years ago.

            So yeah, I think you’re right. With the public facts available, I think the most likely scenario is the carbon fiber hull was fatiguing again, they decided to trust their acoustic/strain monitoring system that they believed would give them enough warning to resurface (which the guy they fired in 2018 said might only give them warnings milliseconds before there was a problem), and it failed somewhere below 3000 meters.

        • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Definitely not. For one, the banging was heard a couple days ago, when there would still have been hope of rescue. Two, if 375 atmospheres of pressure hasn’t broken it, you’re not going to break it with whatever random stuff you can find. And three, although we don’t know that the implosion happened at loss of signal, it’s more likely than them losing signal and then imploding at some later point.

          Edit: Should also add that if the sonar buoys that the search team dropped were able to hear them banging on the hull, they would almost certainly have also heard the implosion. Given that it imploded, it’s much more likely that it happened before the buoys were deployed.