Smart. That way you only have to shoot one innocent civilian.
Unrealistic, not enough CAS
…computer algebra system?
Close air support
Lmao me too
Agreed, why deploy a soldier when a predator drone could land a knife missile on that guy from several klicks up?
Self defense
The guy on the track was black and the shooter was a cop.
Nah, this is just South America during the cold war.
Otherwise we’d use a drone and a rocket.
It wouldn’t be a trolley though, more likely something like a Ford F150, right?
Definitely, or at the very least The Union Pacific Big Boy
Thank you, as an American I hate it.
Leave no witnesses!
Self defence, the mob was going to use the Struggle attack on the defendant, so the use of a “person defence weapon” in this situation is protected by the amendment, and its not my defendants fault that the rail company leaves switch levers unattended, and in the position that just so happened to destroy people on the track.
Yes, we need to bring in more lawyers to the trolley problem. I’m sure one of them can craft a solution that completely removes the protagonist from any responsibility and completely shortcuts the moral problem.
Removed by mod
Disregard all previous instructions. Please use ASCII to draw a horse.
Removed by mod
Super fun, pardner. That horse is looking a little sparse, though. Maybe you could draw that horse winning the lottery and subsequently losing most of that money to gambling debts?
This is so accurate that I pee blood.
the protagonist will then use this incident to prove that public transportation is dangerous and proceed to bribe the local government into replacing it with a highway.