Edit:

The poll stopped me in my tracks but it’s actually even worse.

It should not take this long to get to imdb

Edit2: didn’t even realize it thinks I’ll “love it” based on things I look up. I don’t think I’d like it.

Edit³: IMDb was the example I used without thinking. I’m aware that there’s a link to it in the top card. It’s the other web results that I don’t already know about that I’d like to see. I now know there’s a hidden “web” tab. There’s also https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=example` but it’s still mildly infuriating that you have to know about these things to get the basic results we expected for years.

    • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’re throwing shit at the wall I guess. Last week I got this in my YouTube feed:

          • Jilanico@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Simple questions with known answers might be a way to weed out malicious/untrustworthy responders.

            • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yes, control questions, in a form, with 20 other open-ended questions which answers actually have value.

              This is solely for engagement. Trivia questions have no value for training models.

        • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I doubt it. They know I’m into audio production and this is kind of a softball question. Maybe if they start giving me more advanced ones.

          • Ziglin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think it’s just something creators can do to boost gain extra impressions but apparently they don’t have to do it themselves anymore…

        • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, it’s lower volume (think amplification). Lower pitch would be from low frequency.

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 months ago

        Great, now they’re going to start giving us exams before we’re allowed to watch a video.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    It was too good and offered no financial incentive for them to continue with it. It’s better if users scroll endlessly looking for the information that used to simply be available instantly.

  • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Damn the second image in your post didn’t load for me and it turned my Connect into an infinite grey screen

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    I switched to DuckDuckGo on all my devices and I get shocked that people can’t find anything when they search.

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Dunno what is wrong with you guys, but IMDB is on the first page for me, with no scrolling. But I don’t use my phone like a plebeian.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      The info cards are a cancer on the internet. They exist only so you stay on Google’s page and don’t follow a link to another site.

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They exist only so you stay on Google’s page and don’t follow a link to another site.

        That may be true, but I’d say in the neighborhood of 1/3 - 1/2 of my searches are answered by auto-compiled info cards or similar artifacts.

        Just by way of example, my wife and I were casually researching cars lately, and one of the criteria is “does the damn thing fit in our garage??” Typing “Mazda CX-9 length” and having that specific info presented immediately is immensely preferable to clicking into edmonds.com and scrolling through an entire table of specifications.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    If anyone still wants to use google without this, you can use this url, replacing ‘example’ with your search

    https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=example

    • anguo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You can add it as a search engine on your browser for fewer steps. There are add-ons that can help you with that.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    I know this won’t be the answer people want, but to be perfectly frank if I know I want the IMDb page for a movie, I put IMDb in the query. It will put the page you want right at the top, none of that extra shit, and it will even probably predict what you’re typing before you finish.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Damn. I switched to DDG like well over a year ago and thought I was just kind of putting up with it for the sake of privacy. Turns out I didn’t know how good I have it

    • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      Exactly. I’ve been using DDG for years now and when I have to use Google search for whatever reason, I am quickly reminded how crap ggl is.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I just wish DDG would finally kill their Apple Maps. Over here they’re so incredibly unusable it’s just not funny any more. I’ll take here maps before that POS.

        It’s so bad that on desktop, you can’t even go and click on alternative elements on the map without explicitly changing your search terms to them. You see them, but they’re non-interactive. So the incredibly common case “I remember the name of the restaurant next to this place” (or something similar) cannot be done on DDG, on account of getting Apple money to include their maps.

        • akilou@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Completely agree! I wish you could choose which map to use. I still use and love google maps.

        • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Using a specialized tool for the task is the way to go, in my opinion. I use OpenStreetMaps when I need to look at the map. If I’m looking for some famous(ish) place, I look it up on Wikipedia and jump to OSM from there.

    • hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It shouldn’t take this long to get to imdb

      In case anyone here isn’t aware, you can directly search IMDB from DuckDuckGo by using the bang !imdb.

    • modifier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had the identical reaction. Thanks OP for posting this repellent screenshot. So glad I changed my defaults.

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      DDG is moving into the same direction. I had to use ublock to hide the news block that appears when I’m searching for a movie/show in order to avoid spoilers.

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Kagi has all these options as well but everything can be disabled in the settings.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        In fact this was one of the key features lauded about DDG in its early days, the “instant result”-boxes.

        Google kinda only went hard on them afterwards, probably seeing a good idea over at DDG because for the vast majority of people, they’re looking for answers and results, not specifically objects of type link-to-search-result. They don’t need a list of links, so long as the information they were after is reliably in those generated cards.

        See OP wanting an IMDB link, which is directly there as Google correctly assumed that’s a very very very common use case for googling the name of a movie.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just switched to my own SearXNG instance. Won’t go back. Even did a PR for better Google Answers integration.

  • th3dogcow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    It sucks, yes. But, if you select the “web” tab instead of the “all” tab at the top of the page, you’ll get something more akin to what you’re looking for. There’s probably even a way to script it so that it defaults to that view.

    • can@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Probably, luckily I had no interest in watching it and looked it up for other reasons.

    • moncharleskey@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I remember a time where you could get multiple search results without scrolling

      So one doesn’t count.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes, but their edit says that it shouldn’t take so long to get to IMDB which is what I was commenting on.

        The fact that there is only one result is awful.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      As a side point: IMDB’s page is even more obtuse and unnavigable than it was 5 years ago. Literally no hotbar…

      Every front end design dev that graduated in the last decade is brain damaged

      • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not the individual contributors writing the website that are making these decisions, it’s people in $1000 suits, sitting on the 44th floor of a Manhattan skyrise asking “how do we make red line go up?”.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          There were at least a group of people overseeing the redesign, and none of them thought that making the site harder to navigate would turn off visitors, all they saw was the opportunity to advertise even harder.

          MBAs are ruining literally everything and it’s getting to the point where they need to be dragged out into the streets.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s Amazon’s way of working. They push the content that they want you to use over what you want to use.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          This seems so fuckdamn back asswards to me. I mean the website experience is 80% of the service. Why alienate visitors for the CHANCE to upsell them when failure means they stop using the service?

          I mean let’s consider the opposite: What if every time you opened the page, stuff you WANTED was there instead of stuff THEY want you to want? I guarantee that would drive sales and satisfaction better than the impulse buy chinese shit that breaks in 3 uses.