• jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spammers definitely can’t afford creating 1000 accounts and paying 0 bucks a month… /s

  • Matricaria@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point, who even cares? Are there still people on Twitter? Just move on and use something else.

  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the limit? As long as it’s high I can see this as decent anti spam idea.

    • loobkoob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’d make for a good anti-spam measure if there was a limit to the number of DMs users could send to other people who don’t follow them back. It’d mean people can still use Twitter DMs like a normal messaging service (which isn’t something I care for, but I know some people use it like that).

      As it is, it just feels similar to the whole “rate limiting the number of tweets people can view per day” thing, where they’re taking the most obvious route to reducing bandwidth usage by restricting users.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t yet once reached that limit though. Probably doesn’t affect the vast majority of normal users and I’d imagine same applies to this DM limit aswell.

    • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. Most private messages I get are from fake accounts that probably spam the same message to hundreds of other users aswell.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In that case, it’ll definitely be 69 for new accounts and 420 for established accounts. He’s predictable.

  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kinda pointless when most of the spam I encounter in general is from verified accounts. Love that doucheblock extension, and Blue Blocker for automuting accounts that promote tweets.

    • mateomaui@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      well I just checked the twitter replies and am now adding “sugar daddy”, “sugar momma” and “sugar baby” to doucheblock. They can’t even handle spam replies to the support account.

  • ⚡⚡⚡@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol, you give them a free market and they decide to create a system that looks like it was designed by the CP China…

  • MadeFreshDaily@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Does anyone even use Twitter for anything other than dumb ass politics and seeing free nudes of their favorite e-thot anymore? I don’t think I’ve seen anything entertaining on there in years.

    • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I post my photos there because I reach a significantly wider audience on twitter than instagram. Zero politics on my feed

    • straycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Many absolutely cracked artists post on Twitter and nowhere else, that’s the only reason I’ve ever used it.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are some fandom authors still posting their art on Twitter, some more spicy than others… guess not all are nudes?

    • mateomaui@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a list on there with National Geographic and other accounts that only post interesting things, barely any political stuff. Space and other photography. Trolls don’t appear much there.

      Probably the only reason I still open it now and then.

    • chicken@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      it used to be where i would message my girlfriend (i dont know why twitter thats just how it ended up), but after a few years we made the switch to discord (for now) due to the incoming limits

  • ⚡⚡⚡@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next step: Limiting logins.

    If you log in more than 3 times a day, something must be wrong with you…

  • Uno@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It seems crazy that Twitter is actively taking steps to become a worse social media company. Back when I was a kid, companies were supposed to be these well thought out, highly methodical entities that would only make the most optimal moves. I suppose it’s 2023 now though.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even more interesting is that Reddit is taking a look at it and saying huh that looks good I’ll have the same thing

    • LittlePrimate@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Look up enshittitication, it’s an interesting rabbit hole.

      Basically, the idea is that there is a path companies go along where they first please users to build a user base, once you are bound to a platform and don’t want to leave (because “everyone” is there) they instead start to shift towards pleasing advertisers until they also feel trapped (because “everyone” advertises there). The final move is trying to squeeze as much as possible out of all these trapped people and companies. It’s not just social media, although this of course makes it most obvious at least for a trapped user base. But this also applies for any other big thing that “evryone” uses.

      • prole@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Enshittification” isn’t a rabbit hole, it’s a term made up by a pretty hacky young adult sci-fi author like a few months ago for behavior that has been happening and documented in capitalism for at least a century.

        • LittlePrimate@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Putting a name on a century-old concept isn’t the worst idea because now we can easily refer to it when it happens once again. And yes, the old age of that problem is why I consider it a bit of a rabit-hole. It’s not just something Twitter does now or that tech companies do now because they copy from each other. It’s a quite old concept you’ll hear about again and again and can read up on quite a bit, if you really are interested into more than the basic concept or why companies keep trying even though the outcome does not always see positive (from an outside, users perspective).

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That sci-fi author is 52 “young” already, has spent like 25 years writing and active about the evolution of the Internet and how it impacts personal rights, so I’d give him the right to coin a new term for an old concept.

          It doesn’t prevent anyone from calling it:

          • “Attract, Fidelize, Monetize”
          • “Entice, Entrap, Exploit”
          • “Capture, Enslave, Squeeze”

          …or whatever other set of words doesn’t elicit a negative connotation in the business world at the particular moment in time.

      • Mars@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This looks more like trining to make it run in a stolen raspberry pi in Elon’s basement than trining to extract value.

        Let’s be real, there is no value left to extract.

        • LittlePrimate@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t want to say that Twitters execution of it is perfect, it’s just why Elon comes up with all these seemingly insane ideas. He has a huge userbase that won’t leave, he had advertisers who he thought wouldn’t want to leave and now he’s trying to squeeze. The problem is that he obviously didn’t have his grasp as tightly around the advertisers as he thought, which is why step 3 of Enshittitication entirely fails, at least from what is known to us. The idea is to keep everyone kind of hostage while you squeeze and while it seems to work with a huge chunk of the userbase, a bigger portion of the advertisers simply move on.

          • Mars@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not that huge of a userbase. Pinterest is bigger. Twitter just have a disproportionate amount of celebrities, politicians and journalists addicted to the instant feedback and drama.

            Elon is hooked and high on his own supply, so he seems incapable of understand what Twitter actually IS for most users and that “ego boosting machine for the rich and famous” is not a business plan.

            Enshitification implies a degree of planning and success that he seems incapable of right now. And you can’t jump to step three without achieving steps one and two. Never good for (most of) the users, never good for the advertisers. Nothing to squeeze.

            I mean, it has gone to shit, but it doesn’t seem intentional. Even in the best of circumstances these changes would not be better for the bottom line than just doing nothing.

  • FoxBJK@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, it’s “to fight spam” and not at all an attempt to cut costs of the free users.

    Just keep squeezing Elon. Blood will come out of that stone soon enough I just know it!!

    • TheHalc@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      This won’t do anything to cut any costs.

      This is all about enshittifying the free experience to push those on the edge to finally bite the bullet and start paying.

    • millions @lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Twitter could implement a feature where you could only read like 25 tweets a week and Twitter would still somehow survive