Two women who say they were raped and strangled by the controversial social media influencer Andrew Tate have spoken to the BBC about their experiences.

Another woman has alleged, for the first time, she was raped by Mr Tate’s younger brother, Tristan - also an influencer with millions of followers.

The Tate brothers, aged 37 and 36, currently face charges in Romania of human trafficking and forming an organised group to sexually exploit women. Andrew Tate is also charged with rape.

If found guilty, the two men could be jailed for more than 10 years. They strongly deny the charges against them.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    not really surprised since he has sexist views and i have seen people use ai to make him say slurs

  • Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    “… but but but, he told me to workout…. He can’t be a bad guy….”

  • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hate Andrew Tate, but accusations against “high profile” people shouldn’t just be taken as proof. Otherwise people can get silenced by paying a few women to make such accusations.

    I hope the truth comes to light, and a good sentence is given if deemed guilty.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That has never in the entire history of the human race being an individual who looks more guilty than he does. He gives off rapist energy, out of every pour, how can you possibly be defending him?

      When he was born the midwives probably said oh here’s a bad one.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        That has never in the entire history of the human race being an individual who looks more guilty than he does. He gives off rapist energy

        Completely agree. Too bad that’s not proof of anything, we’re supposed to learn that in grade school

        how can you possibly be defending him?

        They didn’t, they simply reminded everyone that accusations are not in and of themselves proof even if we dislike the person immensely

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah but there is proof literally everything he has ever done proves that this is 100% in his personality to do also he’s done it in the past so it’s not just that I don’t like him he has form.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The difference is that if a few women accused me of rape they wouldn’t be believed because I don’t give off the impression that I’m a piece of shit that hates women.

      When a shitload of women accuse Tate however, the response is correctly “yea that checks out”.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hates - no. But giving off the impression of being weird is not that hard. I’m certain quite a few people would believe something like this about me purely due to being a sunlight-avoiding wimp bad with words (in verbal conversations).

        So due process is a good thing. For each Andrew Tate there are a few dozens at least of people whom “the society” would eagerly accuse simply because of being asocial and weird. Like that folk psychology with red flags, manipulations and other shit. People practicing it can wound an autist. But I seriously doubt those would help them avoid a serial maniac.

      • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ah yes the “he looks like a criminal” card. Great.

        This is the third woman, so it most likely will be true. But we don’t have all the facts.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is not about his looks, but about the misogynistic content he creates. If you are accused of rape, and you openly talk about coercing women into sexual acts I’d say that it checks out.

        • peef ಠ_ಠ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          “he looks like a criminal”

          Watch any content of him opening his mouth, it just reeks of misogyny. So yeah since he’s reported, it checks out.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Please for the love of God go watch his content and then come back and tell me that you think there is even the most microscopic chance that he is innocent of literally any crime ever.

          • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Regardless, we’re not judges. We’re people on the internet with almost no substantial information.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You almost got there you almost managed to get it. The court of public opinion is not a real court so it doesn’t matter and he’s an asshole so who cares.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      accusations against “high profile” people shouldn’t just be taken as proof

      Yeah. I find it highly suspicious that a guy who got famous for being the loudest misogynist on YouTube would be accused of practicing what he preaches. This would be like if someone accused Mike Tyson of hitting him. Or Tucker Carlson of lying. Or Ben Affleck cheating on his wife. Or OJ Simpson of committing a murder.

      You have to take this shit with a huge boulder of salt, because… come on. What are the odds?

      I hope the truth comes to light

      Hearts out to all those possibly wrongfully accused rapists and sex traffickers. Andrew Tate, Harvey Weinstein, Neil Gaiman, Ron Jeremy. Really hope we can clear aside the dozens and dozens of testimonials from people accusing them of wrongdoing and find a piece of evidence I won’t casually dismiss.

      • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        The worst part is they are usually cleared on some sort of bullshit technicality: “Oh, you didn’t dot your I’s in your rape report, so your statement isn’t valid”.

    • Srh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can use circumstantial evidence to know this guy is guilty. The classes he sold about pimping. Him fleeing to Romania because as he said it’s harder to get convicted of sex trafficking. The previous reports on him by other women.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Can you document for me one case where such accusations against a high profile individual were shown in the fullness of time to be hired fraud?

      There probably is some case like that out there - I’m not saying it’s impossible. But given the past we come from, where women were objects without status, I find it very believable that sexual assault is quite common. I need some reason to take your counterpoint as seriously.

      So please, show me that one clear case where we found out that the woman had been paid by political enemies to create false accusations.

      EDIT: 3 days later, still waiting.

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not entirely surprising considering their openly misogynistic views.

    Shame so many people use him as a role model, he’s very dangerous.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Anybody who legitimately gets giddy-as-fuck over the thought of a Muslim woman being stoned to death for adultery should not be trusted with dating advice. Yet somehow this asshole has a social media following of millions, has indoctornated a lot of young people into misogynistic views (I know secondary school teachers who have seen pupils gobble up lots of Andrew Tate content), has eluded bans from mainstream social media (his shit is still all over YouTube), and still has a following despite facing rape and human trafficking charges and being on EUROPOL’s wanted list.

    Isn’t this at all concerning, and a big sign that society is failing men?

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      don’t compare Tate to Assange. Tate is a common criminal who is dumb enough to go on camera and made howto videos on human trafficking and then tried to sell them to kids.