“The emperor only values his throne and will do anything to protect it, while all others are mere resources to be exploited,” writes Aleksandar Đokić, a Serbian political scientist and former lecturer at RUDN University in Moscow. “In other words, the Russian empire is knowingly throwing its own people, people of its own nation, into a meatgrinder, a virtual abyss.”

    • ASH3S@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Officially it did, but in fact Russia is still very much an empire with colonised lands and never stopped being one

      • 0x815@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, already in the title we can read of " Putin’s empire" and it’s clear all over the analysis that the author doesn’t refer with “empire” to the Russia before 1917. I guess @Johnny Wild misinterpreted the text (maybe intentionally? Unfortunately there are some people here on Lemmy who are intentionally misinterpreting some content, although recently this is becoming more and more better imho).

        • Johnny Wild@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Having lived in Russia for more than two decades, and having ancestors who lived in Commie times and Empire times I can say said labeling the current tyrannical regime with “Empire” is a misinterpretation. With the same level of success almost any country in the modern world, even if it hides behind the words “republic” or “democracy”, can be labeled as an “Empire” too.

          • SnowboardBum@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Don’t see too many “modern world” countries, as you put it, attacking neighbors in a land grab. Russia has done so several times over the last couple decades in a very colonial way. Calling it an Empire might be glib, but isn’t incorrect based on their expansion

          • LostCause@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            The word imperialism refers to the practice of a country’s extending its political power, especially through the acquisition of conquered territory. Such a country and the lands it controls are called an empire.

            How does it not fit for you?

          • DreamerOfImprobableDreams@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I can say said labeling the current tyrannical regime with “Empire” is a misinterpretation.

            My brother in Christ, your government is forcefully annexing territory into itself and making the conquered people culturally assimilate at threat of being tortured if they don’t comply. That’s literally the definition of imperialism.

            • Johnny Wild@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I believe that such actions on the part of an empire are in one way or another aimed at the prosperity of its citizens. Putin’s regime is even worse - it does not care about its citizens and therefore I cannot even call its regime an empire.

          • SugarApplePie@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I dunno how many people would take issue with that, I think a fair number of people here would agree that America is an empire too for example

            • DreamerOfImprobableDreams@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              America’s done some fucked up things in the last 20 years, don’t get me wrong, but absolutely nothing comes even close to the horrors of the genocidal war of imperial expansion Putin’s currently waging in Ukraine. There’s absolutely no moral equivalency between the modern US and Putin’s Russia.

              • 0x815@feddit.deOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Absolutely, America has done some fucked up things in the last 100 or so years, but there’s no way to justify one crime with another which is what some posters here on Lemmy often appear to suggest. I feel such attempts to portray moral equivalency is another insult to the victims of these horrors.

              • SugarApplePie@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                absolutely nothing comes even close

                I would definitely not go that far, but I also find that comparing atrocities like this is unproductive at best and in really bad taste at worst when it comes to most online discussions. The conversation should be about the terrible genocidal acts Russia is currently committing, not become a pissing contest of which major empire is the worst out of all the major empires. Especially when such contests belittle the victims of those empires. Russia needs to put an end to this cruel war and take part in some reasonable peace talks already.

  • 0x815@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    In Putin’s Russia, there are no citizens, just subjects

    This is how Russia has operated from the times of Ivan the Terrible, when the backs of princes and their princedoms were broken, ushering in an era of never-ending despotism.

    Imagine living under such a political system, generation after generation, century after century, knowing that your own existence means nothing to lords, Bolshevik commissars, and finally, Vladimir Putin’s cronies.