What’s your opinion? Does google really “not work” anymore? Are there any better search engines? Why did the quality of search results go down? I honestly stumbled onto this question through this music video, what is ironic in it’s own way i feel…

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    The core limitation is that the problem is dramatically more complex than it was when Google started. The number of sites were smaller, there was much less dynamic content, and there wasn’t a sizable portion of the internet committed to an adversarial relationship with search engines forcing everyone else to go to the same extremes just to play catchup.

    What this means is that you’re looking for answers in a much larger search space, and the indicators you used to use are much less reliable. You have more resources to try to balance that out, but there’s so much straight trash to weed through that it’s pretty difficult to do.

  • fades@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nah google definitely still works, it just doesn’t work well or as consistently anymore.

    All these companies paying for SEO bumps to remove or highlight their content fuck with results, just like the Reddit protests did. It’s a real mess because google is more of an ad company than an SE company

    For me depending on what I’m searching for, I’ll use chat gpt or similar AI with internet access/training or may use google or other SE and use site modifiers to keep results to a somewhat related domain.

    I’m really interested to see what people like when it comes to search engines. Duck duck go, Brave, yandex, bing, google, they’re all different states of shit tbh

    Even if they give good results they’re scraping your data to sell or use chromium and is therefore antiAdblock anti user, etc.

  • dragna@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mojeek has been an interesting alternative. I do find myself using google as a backup when I’m not getting what I need, but Mojeek does tend to present very different results.

    I don’t think any other search engine, including DuckDuckGo, has its own web crawler like mojeek does. DuckDuckGo is security based, but still google in the end (similar to how most browsers are actually chromium). It apparently also uses a different term algorithm so you have to readjust how you search because it doesn’t do anything predictive or “smart” in its searching for results.

  • HisNoodlyServant@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Seems to mostly work fine for me. However Google as a company is a fucking mess so doesn’t surprise me people have problems. I have had more problems with my Pixel 7 and Google Maps seems to getting worse and worse.

  • TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve honestly been on DDG for years; I very rarely hit Google anymore, unless I need to map something because DDG maps suck.

  • TheOtherJake@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Google is broken because AI is making it obsolete. I bet in 10 years google will be a historical footnote.

    • phi1997@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’re talking about the AI that provides accurate-sounding results but can’t fact-check and is also used to generate the kind of spam that’s constantly being pushed by search engines, right?

      • TheOtherJake@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not exactly. Stupid people with advanced tools make stupid outputs. Venture capital is pushing the propaganda sauce hard and a lot of stupid people are jumping on AI as a corporate trend. These are the idiots.

        The tools are next level. We are on the edge of this tech becoming a really big deal. There are several research papers making breakthroughs regularly and making double digit percentile improvements on efficiency and accuracy. The reason it is a big deal is because you can have around 1/4 of the knowledge of the entire internet running on hardware as powerful as a current flagship phone. Sure it lies around 1/2 the time, but these are problems that are being solved. Like, the latest and greatest models are ancient history in a matter of 2-3 weeks. To be honest, have a casual conversation with an offline and uncensored LLM. You may know it is lying from time to time, but if you’re being objective, so are most humans you encounter under casual circumstances. The sociological function and potential value of this tech is pretty powerful medicine. Like if you need someone to talk to, or to talk out an issue in private, this is a way to make that happen.

      • gelberhut@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well. Some time ago one had similar arguments about manually categorized web site catalogs and algorithm driven search engines.

        Today’s ai are not areplacment, but in ten years … rather likely.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      AI is driving me mad. Pages and pages of generative text filled articles with nothing to say drive all the humans away.

      Ironically, because Lemmy is so hard to index for search engines, it keeps the AI content spammers away. Mostly. So far.

      • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 years ago

        Hard agree with you on that. AI generated articles are a disaster for the internet. There’s just no quality control any more, especially when actual authoritative sites are no longer in the top search results. Now we’ve got tons more crap-tier content on the internet and no way to differentiate it from the useful content.

  • SimonSing@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    Google is almost impossible to use when I search for solutions to maths problems. The first few pages are dominated by those sites gaming Google’s algorithm and their articles usually don’t help.

    • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yup. DDG is my go to. Every once in a while I have to use Google, but it’s rare.

      Also, buy the Wolfram Alpha app if you want math problems solved easily.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Does anybody else find when using DDG for research that it’s waaay too aggressive about “correcting” your query to something more mundane?

            • snowbell@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Yeah, but DDG uses Bing. I want to switch to Kagi or start a SearXNG server though once I get around to it.

              • bird@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                I have been using Kagi for a month. Really liking it so far! I just subscribed to their basic plan. Much better results than DDG.

  • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    My experience with Google search had degraded dramatically in the last 6mo. Just isn’t pulling up relevant results. Sometimes not even close.

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 years ago

    It hasn’t worked for a while. Even a year ago it was considerably better.

    I can’t believe it, but Bing is now the better search engine. What is happening to the world?!

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 years ago

    I find google works fine if I’m just looking for general information on a simple topic, because it will dependably return a link to the wikipedia entry and a few of the most popular sites.

    And I find that it’s pretty much useless for specific information about narrow topics, because it’s still just going to return the same general shit.

    I’m not sure exactly how the change worked, but some time back (it’s been a year or two now, and maybe more - it’s just something that I sort of slowly realized had happened), they shifted to a system that made Google Fu essentially useless.

    It used to be the case that you could define the importance of search terms by the order in which you listed them and make some effectively required by putting quotation marks around them.

    But starting a couple of years back, it’s been generally ignoring search term order and quotation marks, and instead giving priority to specific common (and certainly not coincidentally common marketing) terms.

    To anthropomorphize, it’s as if it’s developed a cripplingly narrow focus. So if, for instance, you’re looking for the title of some specific movie, it doesn’t matter how many other search terms you include or what order you list the terms in - if you include the term “movie,” that’s what it’s going to focus on. So if you’re lucky, you might get the actual movie you’re looking for, but it’s absolutely guaranteed that you’re going to get streaming services and “18 movies with real blood” style clickbait.

    • distractionfactory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’ve noticed this even when trying to find the name of a song. I used to be able to search:

      lyrics “a specific part of the song I remember” whatever random words I can remember out of order

      and it would very reliably find songs, even obscure ones. Now the only way it works is if I happen to remember part of the name of the song, usually it’s full of entries for the same popular song that has one word in the title that I included that is definitely not what I’m looking for.

      It sounds stupid, but I really miss that working.

    • Rashnet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s complete shit right now. 5 or more years ago I could quickly find an answer to a very technical question with no problem. Now it is useless for anything. Just today I was looking for a shop near me that can perform a front end alignment on my RV, I searched for “Tractor Trailer front end alignment near me”. The entire first page is either tire shops that do not offer front end alignments, car tire shops that don’t even sell the correct size tires I would need for a tractor trailer, or shops 2000 miles away in various directions. It’s horrible and I think it would be faster to look in the yellow pages for what I need in this case. I never found a shop using google.

      Also today I was searching for the tires I need in the shopping tab there were ads for tires that google had labeled as wal-mart but when I would click the link it would take me to a Chinese scam site.

      • SevenSwell@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 years ago

        And God forbid you look for anything involving troubleshooting your home network. Good luck sorting through pages and pages of the same copy and pasted article telling you how to restart your router.

        • TheOakTree@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Have you tried port forwarding? Here’s some vague results and a screenshot of a netgear gateway page from 2006.”

  • willeypete23@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    From googles perspective, you, the user cost them money. Their revenue comes from ads. The brands don’t was to be associated with anything controversial so the results are tailored to be as PG and clean as possible.

  • Metaright@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I append “site:Reddit.com” (I know, I know) to basically every search I perform. It’s the only reliable way at this point to see things written genuinely by real people.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      That used to work until reddit started a war against it’s own moderators and made a lot of people leave to Lemmy.

      Reddit is in a slow death spiral I believe.

    • JBloodthorn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      And to stop it from guessing what it thinks you really meant, change it to “Verbatim” search mode under the Tools button, bottom right below the search bar.