Special offer

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    it is agreed that plant-based diets are statistically the healthiest for humans.

    this simply isn’t universally true. you’re not a dietitician, or, if you are, you aren’t my dietician and you’re not (likely to be) the dietician of the person with whom you are speaking.

    • MTK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Scientific papers have shown time and time again, that is statistically the healthiest diet. I say statistically because every person is different and some people won’t align. Kind of like how statistically it’s healthy to eat nuts, but some people are allergic to nuts.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Scientific papers have shown time and time again, that is statistically the healthiest diet.

        the only one i can think that came close to showing this is the china study which has been roundly denounced by most of its researchers.

            • MTK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Look, if I told you that 1+1 is 2 and you said “prove it” I would say, go learn because I don’t have the time or willingness to teach someone who nitpicks every word I type.

              If you want, check out the youtuber Earthling Ed, he shows plenty of sources for these claims and you can find it there and verify it yourself

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                you’re not postulating simple arithmetic. you’re claiming studies support your position, but you have provided no evidence. by contrast, I cited a study which was well known to support your position, but which is debunked.