Lacanoodle@literature.cafe to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agoMe but ublock originliterature.cafeimagemessage-square196fedilinkarrow-up11.71Karrow-down140
arrow-up11.67Karrow-down1imageMe but ublock originliterature.cafeLacanoodle@literature.cafe to Memes@lemmy.ml · 4 months agomessage-square196fedilink
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down5·4 months agoMy unpopular opinion is that YouTube has every right to enforce ads on their platform if you’re not paying for the service.
minus-squareSettoletto 🍤@fed.dyne.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·4 months agoThe service where they crowd sourced 2/3 of their catalogue from “sharecare” pirate bears?
minus-squareSettoletto 🍤@fed.dyne.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·4 months agooh, wait, i forgot about all the sharecare non-pirate bears that just upload good stuff for the careshare… you know, that other 3/12 of the catalogue…
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·4 months agoI’m… at a loss. Can you rephrase these comments please?
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoMy friend is confused too, care to explain to me so I explain to him?
minus-squareEvilschnuff@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·4 months agoInfrastructure is not free.
minus-squareBedSharkPal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 months agoIt’s much cheaper than the money they make on it though. Hence all the profits.
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·4 months agoYoutube operated at a loss for years
minus-squareZamundaaa@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoIt hasn’t operated at a loss anymore for years you mean?
minus-squareKrankyKong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·4 months agoYou mean when they started playing ads?
minus-squaremrinfinity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·4 months agoAbsolutely not our problem. They can come up with other business models. Maybe they can resurrect one of the hundreds of projects/business models from them at https://killedbygoogle.com/ and run with that
My unpopular opinion is that YouTube has every right to enforce ads on their platform if you’re not paying for the service.
The service where they crowd sourced 2/3 of their catalogue from “sharecare” pirate bears?
oh, wait, i forgot about all the sharecare non-pirate bears that just upload good stuff for the careshare… you know, that other 3/12 of the catalogue…
I’m… at a loss. Can you rephrase these comments please?
My friend is confused too, care to explain to me so I explain to him?
Infrastructure is not free.
It’s much cheaper than the money they make on it though. Hence all the profits.
Youtube operated at a loss for years
It hasn’t operated at a loss anymore for years you mean?
You mean when they started playing ads?
Absolutely not our problem. They can come up with other business models. Maybe they can resurrect one of the hundreds of projects/business models from them at https://killedbygoogle.com/ and run with that