• kobra@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    When a person enters an Alford plea, they maintain their innocence but acknowledge that the prosecution has enough evidence to likely convict them if the case went to trial. In contrast, a guilty plea is an outright admission of guilt.

    An Alford plea allows a defendant to avoid the risk of a harsher sentence at trial while not admitting to the crime itself.

    In essence, an Alford plea is about accepting the legal consequences without admitting personal guilt.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      So my understanding is

      • Guilty plea = “I’m guilty” = Harsh punishment
      • Alford plea = “I’m innocent” = Mild punishment

      Then why doesn’t everyone take the Alford plea, instead?

      • kobra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No it’s more like:

        Go to trial = no plea deal at all = risking harsher sentence OR you know you can prove your innocence

        Guilty plea = accepting full responsibility for the crime and accepting the prosecutions deal of (usually) a lesser sentence to skip the trial and go straight to punishment.

        Alford plea = same as above but maintaining that you are innocent of the charges but cannot prove that against the prosecutions evidence.

        As others have stated, an Alford plea often has to be approved or accepted by the judge or prosecutors so it’s not always an option for everyone.