• Freeman@lemmy.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What I find interesting is this could be avoided by granting exceptions to the existing app devs and being done with it.

    I get the api costs money and theres folks like pushshift aggregating data and using it for their own profit. I’m sure plenty of companies are using data for adverts and more. And there’s an argument there Reddit deserves a cut. Especially if they are using the api to train bots or ai to have conversations for their own inventions.

    But just the ass backwards way they handled devs of existing 3p apps that constitute value add to their data sets is just…mesmerizing.

    And if these users ARENT a majority of the usage or costs, why bother cutting them off and not just granting exceptions to avoid the PR issues.

    • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think you misunderstood spez. He wanted no 3rd party app at all. RIF was paying Reddit for using their brand name and spez terminated the contract. It’s all about control.

      It would be much easier to just inject ads into data returned by the API. Apps will automatically display these ads and developers will understand that if they filter these ads, their access to Reddit will be either limited or completely cut out.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Wait really? Source? I always thought it was unauthorised name use that went quietly unacknowledged for a long time, until they decided otherwise.