Is journalism biased because it doesn’t agree with your worldview? That’s one hell of an authoritarian take.
Edit: For context, EUobserver is one of the most influential news sources for EU officials. It’s widely considered to be reputable and fair in its journalism.
Is journalism biased because it doesn’t agree with your worldview? That’s one hell of an authoritarian take.
Really feels like we are in that sort of a world these days where if something comes from someone you don’t like or agree with it must automatically be fake.
It’s not fake but also not relevant. Good news provides context in addition to simple event facts. The best propaganda is based in truth. The intent here is to promote the idea that the West is rotten and corrupt through and through.
They only get these facts because of a transparent society so antiwestern propagandists have always had an easier time supporting that narrative.
Our takeaway should be that they system is working and ensuring that political interest groups are kept in check and transparent within society. Less liberal societies would simply jail them and hide the evidence.
Propaganda and strategic narratives is literally my profession. Take everything I say with a grain of salt. Just because I believe it does not mean I’m not being strategic. Educate yourselves. Learn how journalism works. Learn its limitations. Experience the world and try not to take it too seriously.
Does that make the news… False?
Sure, DeSmog isn’t the most well-known site, but EUobserver has also reported in this: https://euobserver.com/eu-political/157247
Is journalism biased because it doesn’t agree with your worldview? That’s one hell of an authoritarian take.
Edit: For context, EUobserver is one of the most influential news sources for EU officials. It’s widely considered to be reputable and fair in its journalism.
Really feels like we are in that sort of a world these days where if something comes from someone you don’t like or agree with it must automatically be fake.
The legacy of 2016
It’s not fake but also not relevant. Good news provides context in addition to simple event facts. The best propaganda is based in truth. The intent here is to promote the idea that the West is rotten and corrupt through and through.
They only get these facts because of a transparent society so antiwestern propagandists have always had an easier time supporting that narrative.
Our takeaway should be that they system is working and ensuring that political interest groups are kept in check and transparent within society. Less liberal societies would simply jail them and hide the evidence.
Deleted my reply because you said it perfectly.
Propaganda and strategic narratives is literally my profession. Take everything I say with a grain of salt. Just because I believe it does not mean I’m not being strategic. Educate yourselves. Learn how journalism works. Learn its limitations. Experience the world and try not to take it too seriously.
Sad but true.
I’m not disputing the story. I think knowing the OPs motivation for posting it is useful info.