• derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their social situation probably does. If you are a good for nothing, or they won’t hire you anywhere else, what would you rather? Being homeless or working for Amazon?

      • Sarsaparilla@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well my social situation means I have to take a bargain where it becomes available to me. Not just hypothetically, I’ve actually been homeless in the past so I don’t want to end up there again because I was spending more than I need to of my meager income in some desperate attempt to support people who own brick and mortar businesses. That’s a lot more than I’ve ever had.

      • fidelacchius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So it’s amazons fault for giving “good for nothings” a place to work? Sounds like they are helping the situation

    • owsei@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, minimum wage worker, just beat one the biggest companies of human history

        • Kethal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People here are saying they want to pay Amazon’s competitors, and your argument is that they shouldn’t do that because the workers should be starting their own Amazon competitors…