(No, just keep on. These kinds of regulations were long overdue)

  • Afiefh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s more durable, easier to clean, and the cable breaks instead of the port.

    Citation on the durability claim?

    I’ve been using USB-C since it was released, and none of them ever broke on me.

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not aware of anything to cite. It’s kinda common knowledge if you have phones with usbc ports or do microsoldering work. If you have one at hand to look at, just take a gander. The usbc receptacle has more conductors than lightning and they’re thinner and all on a flexible (and breakable) plastic tongue.

      In a way it looks like an engineer was playing a cruel joke.

      If you just gotta have some kind of data, look up usbc repair videos. There’s a bunch and they showcase all the ways it can get mangled.

      I’m not saying it’s a bad port for a desktop or laptop. It’s kinda perfect for those circumstances. Low cycle, relatively clean, etc. A phone needs the exact opposite: high cycle, extreme durability, extreme dirt tolerance, amenable to field expedient cleaning.