• BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best way because minimal risk and effort for you, and you can always say you didn’t have access to automated tools to do moderation, which is true.

      • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The risk is that they start suing users that act malicious, and this can’t be seen as malicious just incompetent.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Suing unpaid volunteers for not working hard enough? Not a lawyer, but surely you can’t use an employee for not working hard enough. Just do a really poor job, don’t moderate well. What are they going to argue?

        • quantumoverdrive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          sue em back if thats the way the wanna play it i think its high time we got the aclu involved if they seem to think their content is theirs— is an image microsofts etc cuz you used one of their programs to draw it? id say it falls more on the previous mods etc is the way to argue this in court now that i think about it why arent people trying to sue reddit more for billions? futhermore i think they are hiding stuff on their end to investors i think its time the sec got wind of this im a counterpuncher and i dont stop until the enemy is doa thats my mentality

          • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not a bad idea, it requires some organisation and money, it could be done, I’m not sure about this having a legal foot to stand on but someone will know.