Hey folks -

The seemingly never-ending flood of Musk/Twitter news and commentary is getting to some of our users (and some of the mods, too), so we’ve decided to create a general Megathread for all things related to Elon Musk and X/Twitter.

This thread will be a general Musk catch-all, so we’re including news about Musk acting the fool as related to any of his companies (SpaceX, Tesla, Boring). News about those companies that don’t involve Elon can be posted outside this thread.

  • mrmanager@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it’s a bit silly to have megathreads just because some users can’t scroll past posts that doesnt interest them.

    I agree its not great with multiple threads but it’s also not the end of the world imo. Users want to talk about these things. Let them.

    It’s not fun to post on megathreads because your comments get buried. At least it was like that on reddit.

    • mifan@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      To rid the feed of Elon news we now have a stickied post with Elon news. I feel like there’s a meme hidden there somewhere.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This policy functionally does that, but they get to claim they aren’t banning the topics. We can’t talk about the ongoing changes/trainwreck of one of the largest social media websites in the world now on a technology discussion board. Can’t make this stuff up lol

    • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the reason I want a mega thread. I want to be able to scroll past anything Elon. Putting it in one spot is ideal.

    • thedarkfly@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the idea of a megathread is to give the opportunity to avoid a topic that is flooding the community to people not interested.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mega threads should be per event though. Eg, “Trump gets convicted” would be a mega thread. You wouldn’t have an “everything Trump related” mega thread.

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess is some of them simply don’t like people saying bad things about musk and just want to stifle discussion.

      • zark@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure most of the people running Beehaw are more than happy with people saying bad things about Musk. But it does get a little spammy, it’s honestly not all that interesting after a while?

        • hoodatninja@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get that but all this solution does is effectively ban any discussions of Musk, Tesla, SpaceX, or Twitter.

            • hoodatninja@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Within 5 days the megathread will have 1 to 0 comments a day. And that’s a generous estimate. You know this.

                • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because lemmy, like Reddit, is not conducive to the concept of a megathread. It’s the format that’s the problem, not the contents. You expect people to constantly stop what they’re doing and deliberately navigate to an old megathread and then sort through all the comments/conversations happening with days - weeks even - of gaps between them? Nobody does that.

                  • Die4Ever@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Maybe, but Lemmy has sorting options that Reddit didn’t, like Active and New Comments, so maybe we need to reevaluate megathreads for Lemmy

              • Pigeon@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Most of the Musk and Twitter posts don’t even have many comments as it is anyway. And when they do it’s people saying the same thing over and over in multiple splintered comment sections.

                Besides, I don’t think lemmy is that way for megathreads yet like reddit can be. Partly because the userbase is smaller and more engaged, and partly because “active” sort exists.

                • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  People are treating this platform exactly like reddit because the churn of posts is exactly the same. You participate in the first hours or you miss it entirely.

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve noticed that there are tons of people who tries to tell others what to talk about, even what words they should use. What’s going on… :)

        • hoodatninja@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the solution is to all but ban any discussion of him or his companies, all of which are pretty important topics, particularly in US tech news?

          I can’t stand the dude, he’s garbage. I wish he’d fade out of the limelight and let smart people take his companies forward. But to functionally ban any discussions because he’s too present is a big over-correction.

          • prd@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or people could go on the other hundreds of websites that exist and talk about him there?

            • hoodatninja@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well the next time a community bans a topic you think should be allowed you make sure to remember this comment lol

          • Gamma@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t agree with it, I’d prefer people use filters (most clients seem to support them).

        • QHC@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is already a system for users to provide feedback on what articles they do or don’t want to see.

          • russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not here to weigh in on the megathread debate as a whole, but assuming you’re referring to upvotes and downvotes, Beehaw disables the latter.

          • Gamma@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree, and think megathreads should only be used when the scope is limited to prevent the same story from being posted multiple times

    • Zetaphor@zemmy.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think it’s a bit silly to have megathreads just because some users can’t scroll past posts that doesnt interest them.

      The problem is there are so goddamn many, to the extent that I’m working on a userscript that lets me entire hide posts that contain keywords. Checking my frontpage using Subscribed/Active, 5 of the first 20 posts are about this “news”. And that’s a full day after it happened, yesterday was far worse

      Edit: The userscript is ready!

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        IMO the important thing is removing duplicates and pushing people to post to the most relevant communities (and for us regular users, only upvoting the post in the most relevant community). As well, Lemmy itself needs better means of combining the same post across many communities.

        When I say removing duplicates, I also mean for a given event, not a literal duplicate link. We don’t need 5 posts from different media sites on the same event unless a new one is significantly different.

        That’s the issue I’ve been noticing a lot. Every major news site wants to post their own opinion piece on how dumb Musk is (can’t blame em) and it feels like every single one of those will get posted to some Lemmy community.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Of course there are a lot of posts about it. There are big changes happening over at Twitter right now. It will obviously settle down eventually, but it’s an ongoing, pretty significant event.

    • limeaide@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only that, but it slows down discussion and more niche/focused topics are often missed