A feud on Twitter highlights the perils of engaging on the platform and a growing tension among researchers and medical professionals.

  • Gsus4@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anybody know where they’re going? I’ve seen some in mastodon, some in substack, some just on linkedin…but other than rss there is no easy way to follow a larger crowd of posters from different sources.

    • Dee@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s all kind of new so nobody knows where the large majority will land until the dust settles. Probably another year or so. But Substack and Mastodon seem to be the most common from what I’ve seen.

        • bezoar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You may want to link to the beta because they’re directing people there instead and accounts made for the original site don’t work for it. wts2.wt.social

        • Nimgwen@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          on Twitter jimmy said that after they sort out their main focus which is some “trust based algorithm” system that I don’t really understand, they will add activitypub and all sorts of ways to make it more interconnected.

          • Dee@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Well that got me way more interested in it as a platform! Love to hear they’re looking to eventually branch into ActivityPub, I’ll check it out more when that day comes closer.

          • TheDeadGuy@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yeah, the trust based algo is how they operate wikipedia. Basically it rates users on their edits and accuracy, Ina very slow and time consuming manner for the mods. But it means that users get “trust ranks” for their contributions and have more power based on their rank.

            Used on a social media platform will be an interesting experiment, especially if it gets federated. Could be good or bad

        • naoseiquemsou@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Why do I get a bad feeling about it? I hope wikipedia remains the same after that.

          Besides… they ask so desperately for donations, so it makes me wonder if the project can be sustainable.

          Maybe I’m overthinking stuff, let’s see how it goes.