• BeegYoshi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never said to ignore it for low income taxpayers, but the statistic you provided is incredibly misleading. Plus the IRS would recoup far more money by auditing higher income taxpayers at much greater rates.

    • Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      edit: you are right about my assumption on ignoring the taxpayer, that was another persons comment that I confused with yours, my apologies.

      How is it misleading? It’s an incredibly simple statement that the rich are audited at a higher rate than the average person isn’t it? I didn’t say that more wealthy are audited than the common folk because it seems common sense that due to large disparity in population (common vs wealthy), that of course there are more common people audited than wealthy. I’m simply pointing out that this guys statement is incorrect, misleading, and intended to incite anger.

      “the IRS has not enough staff to investigatevif rich people pay their fair share, therefore they go mostly for normal people.”


      Please ignore my negative initial vote score, as I have the privilege of being bot-downvoted by CCP sympathizers because of comments on this post https://lemmy.world/post/2338419, there is also the possibility that I’m just an asshole.