Not hating on open source, just let people use what fits their expectations and needs and stop deterring them with gatekeeping :P

UX = user experience

  • Zeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy doesn’t have ads. If you have to pay to remove them don’t you think something is wrong with that? Why not pay for the community and useful features instead?

    • Zetaphor@zemmy.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re not paying to remove ads from Lemmy. You can continue using Lemmy ad-free on mobile via the mobile site or any of the other PWA’s or native apps. What you’re paying to remove ads from is Sync. The developer has decided that they need to be compensated to sustain the amount of effort developing and maintaining the app requires. If you don’t want to pay that price with cash or your eyeballs then don’t use it.

      Nobody is forcing you to use Sync, nobody is forcing you to see ads. The beauty of a platform like Lemmy is you have the choice to use whatever client you want. That doesn’t mean you’re entitled to any of them.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ads finance the app, I think that’s perfectly fine (in principle).

      I asked the dev a few weeks ago, this app is literally his livelihood. And he has a pretty good track record of delivering good software. Why not support him?

      • Zeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you think more ads is the solution that’s good for you. Ads are society’s cancer, so I have little choice other than to block it. (Paying to get rid of ads perpetuates the idea that ads are profitable. That’s up to you.)

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the three options for him to keep developing that we know of are 1) Ads 2) Pay for a license or 3) Fundraising. He offers 1 and 2, and 3 is well known to not work, seriously nobody donates. Check out npm fund and how so little people used it that they just removed it.

          If your only argument is “I deserve things that took a lot of time and effort for free” then you aren’t getting much sympathy from me.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So for one he’s adding an option to fund your instance as well, but also just because it’s an app doesn’t mean that it also doesn’t require money.

      Your argument doesn’t come off as “so both should be free” but to me more like “oh yeah I’m surprised Lemmy doesn’t have an ad option”

      • eco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Where did you read that he was adding something to fund instances?

      • Zeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve been on open source since the early 90s. I know damn well how people make money off of it and who makes money off of it.

        I support none of it if it starts including tracking and ads. It goes against the whole mindset. Google fanboys love it though.

        • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then pay to remove the ads. Someone has to pay at some point and it’s either you or the guy already spending his time to make the app.

        • Zalack@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why there is an option to disable ads… Everyone wins unless they think this person’s work should be distributed for free.

    • unscholarly_source@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope, because I don’t have an issue with paying for something that I like and enjoy. Don’t like to pay? Nobody is forcing you to. Stop lambasting others for their choice.