• Roundcat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Geographically it is a subcontinent that slammed into Asia to form the Himalayas, so you could make the argument it is its own thing.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Last I checked.

      Fun fact: when you say “Asian” to an American, their first thought is East or Southeast Asia, but a British person’s primary association with “Asianness”, for lack of a better term, is India and Pakistan.

            • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We don’t call it that anymore. Haven’t for decades.

              As for the why, the time when that term was in regular use was a time with a lot of anti-asian bigotry and most of the people who refuse to stop using it are the same ones who use other outdated terms/slurs for non-white and non-western people, so it has tons of negative connotations…

    • panCatQ@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      SEA PROBABLY , however India , pakistan , sri lanka and bangladesh are considered a subcontinent coz similar cultures , and are different from rest of asia !

    • MrSilkworm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      India and Pakistan are considered to be in Asia but more accurately they are considered to be in the Indian Subcontinent. The same way Iran, Saudi Arabia and the rest are also considered to be in Asia but they are more accurately considered to be on the Middle East.