• ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, any reduction is good, including social encouragement for others to join you in things like going car-free. Plus, outside of the environmental effects, cars are horrifically unsafe things when used en masse, and every one we take off the road makes our neighbors safer.

      • Marketsupreme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you subtract 1 from 1,000,000, you wouldn’t be wrong in saying there is a reduction, but is it significant enough? Or is it just febreezing a giant pile of shit?

    • myfavouritename@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that the world does not need “you” to reduce your footprint to zero. But people do have collective power. If everyone reduced their footprint a bit, that would make a dent.

      Even better is if everyone realized that the big polluting beasts are fed by us. Everyone withholding just a little money from these corporations makes the graph of their profit go from pointing up to pointing down. And they sit up and take notice at that, even if they are still making billions annually. They are literally a house of cards and we are the bottom layer.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? It’s like people want to be forced at gunpoint to do the things they know they SHOULD be doing now. What the fuck??

        • Marketsupreme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who says I’m doing nothing? Im just saying you don’t understand human behavior if you think that “we just need to change” is the answer. People are lazy and need incentive to do shit. So systemic implementations are always going to be more effective.