• pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Familiarity (my client distro is Pop and is based on Ubuntu), and I like the LTS life cycle (predictable).

    I do uninstall snaps, though, and mostly just use Docker for things. I could use Debian, but again, for me it was about familiarity and support (a lot more Ubuntu specific documentation).

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used Ubuntu for a while and distr-hopped before deciding to land on Debian. I figured major distros used it as their base for a reason. The older I get the more I appreciate the “it’ll release when its ready” approach that Debian takes. There’s no economic pressure to release with major bugs hoping the next sprint will fix most issues, like a lot of “enterprise” software. The Debian release cycle is not 100% predictable, but it is reliable. I’ve had a server go through a few major upgrades for nearly a decade before the hardware itself gave out. The OS was rock solid the entire time. Additionally, with flatpak, outdated desktop apps are no longer an issue and I use docker for hosting services.

      I will admit that Debian is pretty “bland” from a fresh install, but I don’t mind that at all.