• pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s serverside with browser support. A webserver implements it on their site, so it could refuse to load without WEI regardless of chromium or not.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know. I just had a discussion where someone told me it’d unrealistic to give up YouTube for the alternatives and yadda yadda yadda. It bears reminding that not everyone is as privacy-minded and make up nowhere near a majority. Not caring what happens because you aren’t using chromium is dangerous. It’s still about you and it’s still going to affect you.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not that I don’t care. I intend to do whatever I can to help prevent it. But at the end of the day, if people keep supporting platforms like YouTube, then I see the enshittification of the internet as inevitable. We’re literally welcoming it by doing so.

    • Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Within 6 months of implementation someone will find a way around it, or a FOSS alternative to spoof the WEI signing on servers.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, it’s basically going to be as strong as TLS. Unless the digital signers cert gets leaked, I don’t see how.