• Hexorg@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You bring a great point I hadn’t considered before. Only people with passion for something will do it for free while many more people with so that for cash. Though it’s interesting to see that cash doesn’t make passionate people’s content better it just makes more mediocre content.

      • Hexorg@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Certainly - and there still are those channels that we all love for their dedication. But there are a lot more mediocre channels too

      • dominotheory@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s also a class issue at play. If it can only be an unpaid hobby, then only people with the time to dedicate to it (in lieu of a second paying gig) and the disposable income to buy the necessary equipment (financed entirely by their paid job) are able to participate. For example, I work with people who are also working artists. They use the income from selling their art from their hobby to pay for those materials. It’s not enough to live off, so it’s not their primary income, but they wouldn’t be able to participate in their hobby at the level they currently are if they weren’t able to sell their work. Allowing people to profit from their labor makes these spaces more inclusive and diverse.