• DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still don’t see how one is offensive and one isn’t, when they describe the exact same thing.

    Female as a noun sounds more formal, distant and depersonalizing than woman. Language is all about nuance.

    going to war over it is really stupid.

    I agree with you there. In most cases, and without additional context, I think it’s best to assume ignorance rather than malice.

    On the other hand, it’s also fair to say that this “going to war” only started a few years ago when incels deliberately and maliciously began using the term female to speak about women in a dehumanizing way.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Female as a noun sounds more formal, distant and depersonalizing than woman. Language is all about nuance.

      Well, we’re talking about some random anonymous person on the internet. I think not being personal is quite valid, especially since nowadays you never know how they identify.

      In fact, I do find it odd how first people were being offended by others assuming their identity, so some circles just began to use more general and broad terms, and now that’s offensive too.

      I tend to refer to singular people on the internet as “person”, and I have been corrected by them or.others, i.e. “I’m a woman!” Like, geez, I don’t care or need to know, to me you’re just a bunch of words, you may be a chatbot for what I know.