Need a plate of generic, insipid platitudes with a giant helping of bad science and misogyny?

  • MediumRareChicken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to like him. I fell for the crap. To my 16 year old brain what he said made a lot of sense. He had a handful of good points, and it made me believe the rest of the shit he peddled.

    I see him now, I look back on how I hung onto his words like a lost lamb, and I can only facepalm.

    I realised that the only thing he is good at is marketing, not psychology…

    • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I didn’t believe him, I believed the positive messages he send and implanted. I don’t care about him nowadays, but I also don’t regret internalizing certain stuff he preached. It wasn’t totally bullshit of what he said, until a point where he completely drifted off.

      Thankfully I stopped watching any of his stuff quite a while before that happened, so I dodged this whole mess and only saw the burning ship wrack from the distance. I understand the hard feelings of others who are more involved in this topic though.

      To agree, that something someone said, was correct, isn’t a bad thing. Even if the stuff that follows is off the mark.

      To regret that, would also mean regretting failure, but without failure there’s no progress.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m still pissed that because he badly quotes and misinterprets Jung all the time, people assume Jung is bullshit by association.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being 16 is the best excuse you could have for believing anything that cretin says. You’re good bro.

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He has some good advice (and some batshit crazy certainly), but not anything stoics weren’t saying 2300 years ago. And he sprinkles on top of that a weird religious-adjacent theories that are perhaps due to his psychedelic use. People seem to confuse that rambling with wisdom, like they usually do with cult leaders.

        Still, I think it’s quite probable that he was a fine psychologist and was completely capable of helping individuals in whatever their struggles were. It’s his moving to a youtube stardom that caused all the problems.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Meh, all of the good advice he gives you can get from some other internet guru that isn’t such a grifter.

          “clean your room” and “wash yourself” really aren’t that profound.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As the maoral-less L. Ron Hubbard would say…
          “You don’t make money selling a book, if you want to be rich, start a religion”

          Peterson is just running a dumb cult of generic (kinda bad for most people) advice that hinges on the shared identity of sad lonely boys.

          Peter Pan in the books is sad as shit, advice to never grow up and never try to be better just makes people more lonely and miserable.

          • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Peterson is just running a dumb cult of generic (kinda bad for most people) advice that hinges on the shared identity of sad lonely boys.

            Peter Pan in the books is sad as shit, advice to never grow up and never try to be better just makes people more lonely and miserable.

            Isn’t Peterson’s advice exactly the opposite of Peter Pan’s, though?