• averyminya@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I was reading it I felt the idea that baking under the sun in a landfill could have a similar effect? Sure, that’s not their “intended” use but also looking around extremely trash-filled areas, there is definitely trash baking under the sun in small puddles so they aren’t really being used as intended in the first place.

    Just around my old home in a country where trash isn’t piled up everywhere to the point where it’s a community effort to solve, I saw plenty of styrofoam and wax lined paper cups sitting in the same conditions - damp, wet, and baking. Frankly, it seems weird to say it’s only sensationalism when there are around 600 billion paper/plastic cups made a year and there’s no possible way that 100% of them are being disposed of “how they are intended to be used”.

    While I don’t think it’s the most important thing ever we should focus on, it should be important to mitigate issues like this when we come across them and there’s nothing wrong with raising awareness. At the moment, there are actually hundreds of thousands of these types of products in water and landfills. Whether that’s how they were meant to be or not, if conditions can cause them to break down this way then somewhere along the way it is going to happen because we just can’t properly dispose of 100% of anything.

    • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The point is that the article gives no context for their statistics. This is super common in science journalism.

      For example, take the articles that came out after the vaping and heavy metal study came out. Vapes have heavy metals in them. Scary!

      What they didn’t mention was that the levels found were lower than atmospheric levels.