Sorry if I’m not the first to bring this up. It seems like a simple enough solution.

  • potustheplant@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The reason nvidia has the r&d budget it has is because you buy their cards. AMD is just now matching them on that but they used to have about half the resources.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, I buy my cards second hand because I’m dirt poor, but I still want the best option for my money. It’s a hard sell to convince people to buy inferior products to expand the market.

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except that most of nvidia’s features are borderline gimmicks or will not have a long lifespan. DLSS will eventually die and we’ll all use FSR just like it happened with gsync vs freesync. Raytracing is very taxing still for all cards in all brands to be worth it. RTX voice (just like AMD noise supression) is not something that useful (I don’t even want it). What else do you have that could make an nvidia card “superior”? The only thing I can think of is that the most recent nvidia cards are way more energy efficient than amd’s.

        • Sina@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only thing I can think of is that the most recent nvidia cards are way more energy efficient than amd’s.

          I think power draw is so close to even right now, that it’s not worth talking about.