• IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I bet if Apple didn’t take the leap to a USB-C only laptop design most laptops from other manufacturers would still be USB-A only.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most peripherals still use USB-A though, so I’ve never seen the advantage of having a USB-C port on my laptop. I never use it. I guess I could connect my phone, but that seems rather pointless. (Most of the charging bricks I own still have USB-A too, and I have way too many to go buy another one. It was cheaper just to buy a new cable for me phone.)

          • TurtleTourParty@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s nicer for laptops because you can have power, display, and internet in one cable going to a dock. TBH I don’t see many benefits for desktops. You could daisy chain monitors and have less cables I guess.

            • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, I see now. Yes, I can see how that would be a nice benefit for using it on a laptop. I’m not even sure my monitors have USB-C inputs, but I’m probably behind the times

    • legios@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Intel also had them in their higher end consumer gear (eg. their high-end NUCs etc)