• Ravi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are different dimensions for this, balance of importance differs between users and application:

    • data transfer rate
    • power transfer rate
    • durability
    • reusability with other products
    • length
    • price
    • someone made it white and engraved a pictogram of an incomplete apple on it
    • BornVolcano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, so getting information and energy to and from the phone (what a cable does), how long it lasts, how many different types of cables you’d have to buy to work with similar devices you have, length and price are self explanatory, and whether or not apple is being apple.

      I think I got it, thank you!

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry, apple is still limiting data transfer to usb2 protocols except on the pro models

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is zero technical reason to limit the speeds. Apple is just being an asshole and wants to misrepresent USB-C to their customers. Because again, Apple are assholes.

      • Ravi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I always expect them to find a loop hole to sell their ridiculously expensive peripherals. My best bet is a chip that forces you to use an apple usb c cable.