• trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    With competition, other units will be cheaper. Units will be rented for production costs. Competition is not a bandaid but the solution.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao you can’t be serious?! Where is this competition right now and why aren’t they completing currently competing?

      • trailing9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are many obstacles like complex building codes, limited supply of building sites, credit requirements or limited public transport. Reduce them, respectively increase public transport, and more people have an opportunity to spend their money on real estate with the expectation of profits.

          • trailing9@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who should create real estate without profits?

            If you supply housing as a government service, construction workers will play the same games as defence contractors. Do you expect rent to be cheaper?

            What’s wrong with profits? They compensate for the risk and effort that comes with creating real estate. They are only too high when there is no competition.

            If profits are too high, what is preventing you from creating a new house and be rewarded with those profits? Change the world so that you, and thus others, have the ability to participate. Then housing prices will be fair.