I was happily using this for a year or so now. Feels fairer than using an ad blocker. But now they apparently want more money out of people. Feels like some sort of internet video apocalypse is happening, where the services become extremely fragmented and expensive, like YouTube, netflix, hbo, Hulu, Disney+ and whatnot. Each wants some 10-20€ out of your pocket.

I guess that means back to ad blockers and piracy…

  • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nebula is so cheap I have a subscription even though I almost never use it. I would use it more if they had a better recommendation system, as it is now you almost have to search for a specific video you want or dig through piles of random videos you don’t care about.

    • SeriousBug@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I mostly open Nebula when I’m watching a video, and the creator says “I had to censor this on YouTube, you can get the full version on Nebula”

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would get a subscription but (at least last I checked) they don’t want European customers. Who the fuck has a credit card and why aren’t you accepting plain old bank transfers. I half-way expected them to list “mail us a cheque” under payment options.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally pretty much every online service - especially subscription ones - want a card. Not necessarily a credit card, but at least debit.

        Even in Europe many people have credit cards and pretty much everyone with a bank account has a debit card.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have a bog-standard bank account and yes of course it comes with a debit card that doesn’t mean that it works with the US-centric “enter card number and expiry date” system, though. Way too insecure anyway.

          Steam manages to use Giropay, I can understand if a US company doesn’t want to deal with that kind of solution1 but accepting SEPA transfers is dead-simple, dirt cheap, and covers 100% of the EU (and more) market.


          1 The German banking sector, alas, in in the habit of pioneering stuff and then be incompatible with what big financial players elsewhere come up with. Other times the rest of the world simply doesn’t care, e.g. when it comes to HBCI/FinTS.

      • YuzuDrink@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, there are parts of the world where you can pay for online subscriptions via BANK TRANSFER?!

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bank transfer is the standard option because everyone has a bank account and everyone can do it, also, there’s generally zero fees attached. There may be more convenient options, but it basically always is there as a fallback. As a company you have an account, anyway, only thing you need to do is have your payment system look through incoming transactions and scan the “intended use” field for a transaction id or account number or such you told people to put in there.