My mistake, I was listing numbers off the top of my head and was admittedly overzealous, as happens in online discourse, and yes it was by multiple orders of magnitude. I will concede on this.<
That was an straightforward bit of overzealotry to demonstrate. You’re far from the only one who does it, it’s VERY common and abetted by a significant disinformation system. You get caught up in emotions, exaggerate - here by 495,000!!! - and use that as if it were justification and substantiation of your arguments. Other people do it too, and you’ll have been persuaded by those exaggerations. The internet makes it worse but it’s been going for longer than Israel has existed as a modern state.
The Gaza strip is the world’s largest open-air prison, due to Israel’s blockade<
How many times do I have to write this before it gets through? The blockade is entirely due to militants (Hamas and all of the other groups, with a collective history going back to the Ottoman Empire) and the terrorism they bring to rid the entire land of infidels/Jews and enact sharia law. Yes, the blockade sucks. Yes, it hurts civilians. Perhaps you haven’t heard or seen what Hamas actually did - a level of barbarism Israel has NEVER done - beheading babies, raping dozens of women, parading their bodies through the streets, do I have to go on with this sickening list for you to recognise the depth of atrocities committed? They fucking beheaded babies. But the information is out there now. Trying to prevent this is why there is a blockade.
So tell me, if you’re not justifying the complete slaughter of all Palestinians in the region, what are you arguing for? If you’re not advocating ethnic cleansing, what is it you’re advocating for?<
Recognition of Hamas’ agency in this. Recognition of militants’ agency in this. Recognition of non-combatant Palestinian extremists’ agency in this. Recognition of other Muslim agency in this. Recognition that every de-escalation by Israel has been used by militants, not to build Palestine but to regroup and rearm. Recognition that Israel cannot fix this unilaterally and that there is no one for Israel to negotiate peace with.
Why wouldn’t you at least keep quiet so you can play the role of a complicit bystander, rather than speak up and become an avid advocate?<
And we come full circle in your post, where you start by recognising your overzealousness in getting the number of Palestinian deaths you’re accusing off so enormously, egregiously wrong, to you overzealously accusing me of this enormously, egregiously wrong sort of crap.
Your emotions have run away with you. However justified in those emotions you might feel, they’re leading you to thoroughly unjustifiable errors.
Let’s see, so first you focus on me conceding on a point where I was wrong, and use that to leverage the rest of your argument as though it means I’m entirely wrong.
Then you bring up a blockade that’s existed for years and justify it with horrific acts that happened in the last several days.
Then you recognize the evil of Hamas to justify ethnic cleansing of those who are not Hamas.
Then you misrepresent my entire post as being “emotional” and because I get emotional at the prospect of ethnic cleansing, I must be wrong. You even misrepresent your own arguments as not being ones that justify the ethnic cleansing you just finished justifying.
You say my emotions run away with me leading me to unjustifiable errors, but your emotions have run away from you to lead to you to justify ethnic cleansing of mostly children who’ve known nothing but a life of oppression, starvation, and little access to education or medicine.
This discussion’s over, I’m blocking you, since it’s pretty obvious you’ll justify any murder if the situation gets dicey. Nothing of value comes from indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, and I hope you’re ashamed.
That was an straightforward bit of overzealotry to demonstrate. You’re far from the only one who does it, it’s VERY common and abetted by a significant disinformation system. You get caught up in emotions, exaggerate - here by 495,000!!! - and use that as if it were justification and substantiation of your arguments. Other people do it too, and you’ll have been persuaded by those exaggerations. The internet makes it worse but it’s been going for longer than Israel has existed as a modern state.
How many times do I have to write this before it gets through? The blockade is entirely due to militants (Hamas and all of the other groups, with a collective history going back to the Ottoman Empire) and the terrorism they bring to rid the entire land of infidels/Jews and enact sharia law. Yes, the blockade sucks. Yes, it hurts civilians. Perhaps you haven’t heard or seen what Hamas actually did - a level of barbarism Israel has NEVER done - beheading babies, raping dozens of women, parading their bodies through the streets, do I have to go on with this sickening list for you to recognise the depth of atrocities committed? They fucking beheaded babies. But the information is out there now. Trying to prevent this is why there is a blockade.
Recognition of Hamas’ agency in this. Recognition of militants’ agency in this. Recognition of non-combatant Palestinian extremists’ agency in this. Recognition of other Muslim agency in this. Recognition that every de-escalation by Israel has been used by militants, not to build Palestine but to regroup and rearm. Recognition that Israel cannot fix this unilaterally and that there is no one for Israel to negotiate peace with.
And we come full circle in your post, where you start by recognising your overzealousness in getting the number of Palestinian deaths you’re accusing off so enormously, egregiously wrong, to you overzealously accusing me of this enormously, egregiously wrong sort of crap.
Your emotions have run away with you. However justified in those emotions you might feel, they’re leading you to thoroughly unjustifiable errors.
Let’s see, so first you focus on me conceding on a point where I was wrong, and use that to leverage the rest of your argument as though it means I’m entirely wrong.
Then you bring up a blockade that’s existed for years and justify it with horrific acts that happened in the last several days.
Then you recognize the evil of Hamas to justify ethnic cleansing of those who are not Hamas.
Then you misrepresent my entire post as being “emotional” and because I get emotional at the prospect of ethnic cleansing, I must be wrong. You even misrepresent your own arguments as not being ones that justify the ethnic cleansing you just finished justifying.
You say my emotions run away with me leading me to unjustifiable errors, but your emotions have run away from you to lead to you to justify ethnic cleansing of mostly children who’ve known nothing but a life of oppression, starvation, and little access to education or medicine.
This discussion’s over, I’m blocking you, since it’s pretty obvious you’ll justify any murder if the situation gets dicey. Nothing of value comes from indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, and I hope you’re ashamed.