Anakin has a clear motive, and a logical progression from naive to evil.

Danny just decides to lose her shit one day.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly a huge amount of people overlooked the red flags with Danerys, because reasons. The final flip to full on crazy was poorly done, but there was a history of violent and cruel outbursts.

    • chetradley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let Kahl Drogo violently kill her brother. Burned Mirri Maaz Durr alive. Crucified the slave masters of Meereen. Burned the horse lords alive.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      True but each of those times her violent outburst felt grounded. Character A does a very bad thing to Danerys, and she reacts. It made sense to her character. Kings landing didn’t, because the people of Kings Landing cheered her arrival. Cersci was not popular and about to fall anyway, Danerys could have had what she wanted, Westeros and the love of the people.

      To make her turn work Cersci needed to fall before Danerys got to Westeros and someone likable is on the Iron throne. Now the people want to hold onto their new monarch who saved them from Cersci or have Cersci turn likable. She had a rough start but through experience becomes a good leader only to have Denarys dethrone her. Something other than RING THE BELLS.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It only feels grounded because you get her pov and the other side is obviously bad (according to her), so they totally deserved it. She showed up to several cities, murdered the fuck out of them, took what she wanted and left. Yes the turn to full on evil was handled poorly, but all the signs were there before hand. Tyrion’s speech after the fact said as much.