• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    In August, remote or hybrid job posts attracted more than one-half of all applications in 157 of the largest metro areas, according to LinkedIn data analyzed by Bloomberg. All the while, the number of hybrid or remote job posts has declined since 2022.

    So companies that allow remote work will have the pick of the best applicants, while those without will be left with anyone who can’t get a remote job. This will make in-person companies less effective and productive, especially because studies are showing remote work is more productive.

    But at least their commercial property values won’t go down. So that’s nice.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also means that remote employers can pay less for better talent due to the intense competition. It’s somewhat of a win-win, as it results in cost savings for companies while allowing workers to choose if they prefer flexibility of remote work versus a higher paycheck. I imagine that the pay doesn’t make much of a difference in pocket money when considering commuting costs and higher CoL in areas closer to jobs.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any company who sees that by going fully remote they pay less for better workers and avoid paying for office space and doesn’t do it is going to see investor backlash.

    • brakenium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tend to have a harder time focusing at home compared to at work. I doubt the productivity difference is the same way for everyone