• deegeese@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    328·
    1 year ago

    I used to tie my ugly mutt up in front of the corner market while I grab a few things. Never to someone’s bike of course.

    I do not take such a risk with my expensive purebred.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        510·
        1 year ago

        Why? Because I know which dog might get stolen?

        Should I have denied the mutt walks because of what people might think? Or should I endanger the purebred out of some strange sense of fairness?

        • can@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          131·
          1 year ago

          Without the additional context it easily sounds like you don’t give a shit what happens to some mutt.

          • deegeese@sopuli.xyzEnglish
            69·
            1 year ago

            Nobody was going to steal a grumpy arthritic mutt.

            He was a good dog, but not much “curb appeal”.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        214·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t own both dogs at the same time, but 100% serious. What’s the problem?

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.deEnglish
          3·
          1 year ago

          You don’t see an issue in handling a dog poorly, because, as you put it, it’s an “ugly mutt” and then go ahead and tell us how much better you treat an animal because it was more expensive?

          You really shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog or any animal.

    • Calavera@lemm.eeEnglish
      22·
      1 year ago

      I see this all the time, don’t think it’s such a big deal also, sometimes I don’t understand social network people