• irmoz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sighhhhh

    it is so tiresome being lied to when the evidence is a short scroll above

    it really does stink of being obstinately against change for no reason other than it being change.

    • Risk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As I said, I can’t fix your confirmation bias.

      I wasn’t pointing to a conspiracy, merely the fact that the criticism voiced so far doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

      Edit:

      I just realised you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

      Those are two different topics.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        doesn’t have any substance to it other than ‘I don’t like it’ and therefore is likely because it’s new and different.

        So, just being against progress. Like I said.

        you may be conflating my argument here about what constitutes as ‘art’ with artists making a case they’ve been ripped off because LLMs have been trained on their work.

        Lol no.

        • Risk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          against progress

          Who? Artists, generally or those upset that AI/LLMs have been taught from their work? Not what I’m implying at all, as already highlighted extensively.

          People criticising AI/LLM art as ‘not art/not creative’? Yes.

          If you’re not conflating my argument, then you are either being really fucking stupid or deliberately trolling. In either case, I’m done wasting my time on you.