• doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Listen if there is no generational gap between you and boomers, then you’re just a Gen X, mate. One generation to the next, no skipping.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you know what the word Generation means? Literally in no other context is it defined that way, but you’re using Wikipedia as a source so clearly I don’t expect you to have any learning capacity at this point. Maybe you really are Gen Alpha at your mommy’s tablet.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I can’t believe you’re this confident about something so basic and somehow you’re wrong

          Also, what, can’t win an argument without infantilizing your opponent? I mean it’s clear you know nothing about this topic and just assume you can “debate” about it using google or whatever, ironic coming from the guy who discounts wikipedia. That’s better than anything you’d know by a good margin anyways.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Wow really got me lmao

              Like seriously? “Uhhh duhhh nuh uh, no you” is the best you could come up with? What are you, five?

                • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There’s not much point in doing that. Like I said, you don’t know what you’re talking about, and it’s just an argument of which definition is best to use, so it’s not really much of a debate. TL;DR: Not interested.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, I think this is just trolling at this point. No way someone can make this argument in good faith AND throw out that weak of an insult.

          • Arrkk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its like its totally impossible for a word to mean 2 slightly different things is different contexts.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah if only we had some sort of non profit organization to run some sort of massive online wiki to keep this all straight for us.

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                If only that organization had a citation method at the bottom of every page where anybody with half a brain could find actual sources.

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, clearly your clear misunderstanding of a topic must be because people are not providing primary sources…

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it was a banger insult, just enough not to seem unreasonable. If I wanted to alienate the opposition then discussion would very quickly become meaningless, like your comment for example: completely devoid of any relevant context, only an attack on my person.